Literature DB >> 489651

Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. Analysis of sixty-seven cases followed for three to seven years.

W J Finnegan, J M Fenlin, J P Marvel, R J Nardini, R H Rothman.   

Abstract

Sixty-seven of seventy-three patients who had had multiple operations on the back with an initial diagnosis of lumbar-disc disease were reevaluated as to relief of pain two and four years after the most recent operation. More than 80 per cent of the patients had gained enough relief to deem the procedure worth while. A diagnosis of fibrosis, preoperatively or intraoperatively, portended a poor result, while the opposite was true with diagnoses of mechanical compression (disc fragment or stenosis) and instability (pseudarthrosis after fusion or spondylolisthesis). The presence of a pain-free interval lasting one year from the date of the previous operation correlated highly with the presence of a surgically remediable lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 489651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  23 in total

1.  Fifty years ago in CORR: Lumbosacral fusion: the mortised transfacet method by use of the vibration electric saw for circular bone blocks.

Authors:  Earl D McBride; Howard B Shorbe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  MRI after successful lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  J W Van Goethem; E Van de Kelft; I G Biltjes; B A van Hasselt; L van den Hauwe; P M Parizel; A M De Schepper
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Reasons for failure of L5-S1 intervertebral disc excisions.

Authors:  E L Radin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery: results in 130 cases.

Authors:  J Fandiño; C Botana; A Viladrich; J Gomez-Bueno
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  SPORT: does incidental durotomy affect long-term outcomes in cases of spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Atman Desai; Perry A Ball; Kimon Bekelis; Jon Lurie; Sohail K Mirza; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Dural tears in primary decompressive lumbar surgery. Is primary repair necessary for a good outcome?

Authors:  Sean Grannum; Mohammed Shakil Patel; Fahad Attar; Martyn Newey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Contrast-enhanced MRI versus myelography and contrast-enhanced CT in postdiskectomy problems.

Authors:  M Annertz; G Hägglund; S Holtås; B Jönsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The profile of multiple- versus single-operated patients at the time of their first operation for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The Graf stabilisation system: early results in 50 patients.

Authors:  M P Grevitt; A D Gardner; J Spilsbury; I M Shackleford; R Baskerville; L M Pursell; A Hassaan; R C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.