Literature DB >> 608279

Surgery for intervertebral disk disease of the lumbar spine.

L L Wiltse.   

Abstract

There is little doubt that surgical treatment of lumbar spine pain is often unsatisfactory. It is likely that we are using a cannon when a peashooter properly aimed would do a better job. Various injection techniques, especially injection of the disk itself would seem to be a rational approach. Scarring around the spinal nerves and dura is an unsolved problem. The search for an interposition membrane goes on. Fat grafts are being advocated, but it is too early to evaluate their efficacy. The problem of how to adequately decompress the nerves in spinal stenosis without jeopardizing spinal stability is still unsolved. Interbody fusion still carries a high failure rate as far as fusion is concerned, but what is worse, failure to relieve the pain for which it was done remains frequent. Spine pain programs concentrating upon training in exercises, training in the proper way to perform the activities of daily living and especially psychological counseling and operant conditioning probably represent the greatest single recent advance in the rehabilitation of the low back sufferer. Finally, there is an unfulfilled need for more accurate reporting of our subjective clinical results if advances are to be made in this area, where pain is the principal problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 608279     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197711000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  Anatomical study of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Raphaël Vialle; C Court; N Khouri; E Olivier; L Miladi; J L Tassin; T Defives; J Dubousset
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1975 to 1995.

Authors:  O Niggemeyer; J M Strauss; K P Schulitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based anatomical study of the multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Haijun Li; Lei Yang; Jinhua Chen; Hao Xie; Weizhong Tian; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Should backache be treated with spinal fusion? Spinal fusion is the only treatment for discogenic pain.

Authors:  J P O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-06

6.  Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery: results in 130 cases.

Authors:  J Fandiño; C Botana; A Viladrich; J Gomez-Bueno
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Factors influencing the outcome of operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  M U Lehto; P Honkanen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Painless root compression following disc extrusion. A report of three cases.

Authors:  N Halperin; M Agasi; D Hendel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1982

9.  Lumbar extraforaminal decompression: A technical note and retrospective study looking at potential complications as an outpatient procedure.

Authors:  Justin W Miller; Rick C Sasso
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-03-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.