Literature DB >> 30069537

The effectiveness of non-surgical treatments, re-discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in post-discectomy pain syndrome.

Mehmet Nuri Erdem1, Halil Yener Erken2, Mehmet Aydogan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been many studies that reported various treatment options about recurrent disc herniation, recurrent sciatica, and low back pain following discectomy. However, evaluation and treatment algorithm of post-discectomy pain syndrome (PDPS) could not be standardized. The purpose of this study was to report the results of patients with PDPS who were treated with various treatment options with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 54 of 75 patients with PDPS who had no response to 12 weeks of conservative treatment between 2009 and 2014. Fifteen of 21 patients with re-herniation who did not respond to non-surgical treatments benefited from re-discectomy. Twenty-seven patients eventually underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery and 12 patients, who had no need for surgery, responded well to the non-surgical treatments. All patients were evaluated using the 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preoperatively and at the post-treatment or postoperative follow-ups.
RESULTS: Pre-treatment mean VAS score of the patients who benefited from non-surgical treatments was 7.9. The mean VAS score decreased to 2.1 at the final follow-up. The mean pre-treatment ODI was 46%, which decreased to 25.9% at the final follow-up. Preoperative mean VAS score of the patients who were treated with MIS-TLIF surgery was 8.1. The average VAS score decreased to 1.8 at the final follow-up. The mean preoperative ODI was 48%, which decreased to 24.2% at the final follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Twelve of 54 patients with PDPS regardless of underlying etiology benefited from non-surgical treatments. Fifteen of 21 patients with re-herniation benefited from re-discectomy. MIS-TLIF is found as a highly effective procedure for the relief of post-discectomy pain that is resistant to non-surgical treatment options and for patients who had a second re-herniation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF); non-surgical treatment; post-discectomy pain

Year:  2018        PMID: 30069537      PMCID: PMC6046348          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.04.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  36 in total

1.  Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients.

Authors:  Finn B Christensen; Ebbe S Hansen; Søren P Eiskjaer; Kristian Høy; Peter Helmig; Pavel Neumann; Bent Niedermann; Cody E Bünger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Spinal fusion for back pain: a clinical and radiological review.

Authors:  J O'Beirne; D O'Neill; J Gallagher; D H Williams
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-03

3.  Observations on the management of failed spinal operations.

Authors:  H V Crock
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-05

4.  Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Hae-Dong Jang; Byung-Joon Shin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: results of operative management.

Authors:  K S Suk; H M Lee; S H Moon; N H Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Late results of laminectomy for lumbar disc prolapse. A review after ten to twenty-five years.

Authors:  A Naylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1974-02

7.  Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study.

Authors:  C K Lee; N A Langrana
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Recurrent disc prolapse as a cause of recurrent pain after laminectomy for lumbar disc lesions.

Authors:  G Martin
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1980-03-26

9.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with a previous discectomy: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Young Woo Choi; Kyeong Hoon Sung
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-08

10.  Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy.

Authors:  P J Lewis; B K Weir; R W Broad; M G Grace
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of Functional Outcome Predictors in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Single-Centre Analysis.

Authors:  Renata Marques; Sara Gomes; João Nogueira; Miguel Afonso; Nubélio Duarte
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-27

2.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Management of Post-Discectomy Syndrome.

Authors:  Ahmed Bahaa Al Din AlShazli; Ashraf Yassin Amer; Ahmed Maher Sultan; Ahmed Samir Barakat; Wael Koptan; Yasser ElMiligui; Hesham Shaker
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-11-08

3.  Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors:  Aimin Wu; Lyn March; Xuanqi Zheng; Jinfeng Huang; Xiangyang Wang; Jie Zhao; Fiona M Blyth; Emma Smith; Rachelle Buchbinder; Damian Hoy
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

4.  Early Failures After Lumbar Discectomy Surgery: An Analysis of 62 690 Patients.

Authors:  Andre M Samuel; Kyle Morse; Francis Lovecchio; Noor Maza; Avani S Vaishnav; Yoshihiro Katsuura; Sravisht Iyer; Steven J McAnany; Todd J Albert; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-07-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.