Literature DB >> 24993215

Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.

Golbarg Mehraei1, Frederick J Gallun2, Marjorie R Leek2, Joshua G W Bernstein3.   

Abstract

Poor speech understanding in noise by hearing-impaired (HI) listeners is only partly explained by elevated audiometric thresholds. Suprathreshold-processing impairments such as reduced temporal or spectral resolution or temporal fine-structure (TFS) processing ability might also contribute. Although speech contains dynamic combinations of temporal and spectral modulation and TFS content, these capabilities are often treated separately. Modulation-depth detection thresholds for spectrotemporal modulation (STM) applied to octave-band noise were measured for normal-hearing and HI listeners as a function of temporal modulation rate (4-32 Hz), spectral ripple density [0.5-4 cycles/octave (c/o)] and carrier center frequency (500-4000 Hz). STM sensitivity was worse than normal for HI listeners only for a low-frequency carrier (1000 Hz) at low temporal modulation rates (4-12 Hz) and a spectral ripple density of 2 c/o, and for a high-frequency carrier (4000 Hz) at a high spectral ripple density (4 c/o). STM sensitivity for the 4-Hz, 4-c/o condition for a 4000-Hz carrier and for the 4-Hz, 2-c/o condition for a 1000-Hz carrier were correlated with speech-recognition performance in noise after partialling out the audiogram-based speech-intelligibility index. Poor speech-reception and STM-detection performance for HI listeners may be related to a combination of reduced frequency selectivity and a TFS-processing deficit limiting the ability to track spectral-peak movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993215      PMCID: PMC4187385          DOI: 10.1121/1.4881918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking.

Authors:  B C Moore; A Sek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  T Y Ching; H Dillon; R Katsch; D Byrne
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of temporal waveform shape on spectral discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  M R Leek; V Summers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.

Authors:  Olaf Strelcyk; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.

Authors:  Dan Gnansia; Vincent Péan; Bernard Meyer; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Valeriy Shafiro; Christian Lorenzi; Rachel McMullen; Caitlin Farrell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Binaural temporal fine structure sensitivity, cognitive function, and spatial speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners (L).

Authors:  Tobias Neher; Thomas Lunner; Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Diminished temporal coding with sensorineural hearing loss emerges in background noise.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

2.  Auditory "bubbles": Efficient classification of the spectrotemporal modulations essential for speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Gregory Hickok; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Frederick Gallun; Richard Wright
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Spectral aliasing in an acoustic spectral ripple discrimination task.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; David L Horn; Anisha R Noble; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Individualized frequency importance functions for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Adam K Bosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Identification of the Spectrotemporal Modulations That Support Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Allison-Graham Martin; Gregory Hickok; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Ryan W McCreery; Benjamin J Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Peggy Nelson; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Audiomotor Perceptual Training Enhances Speech Intelligibility in Background Noise.

Authors:  Jonathon P Whitton; Kenneth E Hancock; Jeffrey M Shannon; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.