Literature DB >> 8315006

Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia, the PACE 2 assay, and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from cervical specimens in a low-prevalence population.

J Blanding1, L Hirsch, N Stranton, T Wright, S Aarnaes, L de la Maza, E M Peterson.   

Abstract

The Clearview Chlamydia assay (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.), the PACE 2 DNA probe assay (GenProbe, San Diego, Calif.), and culture were compared for their abilities to detect Chlamydia trachomatis from cervical specimens in a population with a low prevalence (3.9%) of chlamydial infections. A consensus reference method was used. The consensus reference method defined a positive specimen as one with a positive culture result or positive by both of the two nonculture methods. Of the 940 specimens tested, 37 were positive; 36 were positive by culture, 28 were positive by the PACE 2 assay, and 27 were positive by the Clearview assay, giving sensitivities of 97.3, 75.5, and 72.9%, respectively, and specificities of 100, 97.1, and 98.9%, respectively. There was a direct correlation between the number of inclusion-forming units detected by culture and the ability of the two nonculture methods to detect the positive specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8315006      PMCID: PMC265591          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1622-1625.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

2.  Evaluation of the rapid CLEARVIEW Chlamydia test for direct detection of chlamydiae from cervical specimens.

Authors:  N J Stratton; L Hirsch; F Harris; L M de la Maza; E M Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of monoclonal antibody staining and culture in diagnosing cervical chlamydial infection.

Authors:  E S Lipkin; J V Moncada; M A Shafer; T E Wilson; J Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Effect of swab type and storage temperature on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from clinical specimens.

Authors:  J B Mahony; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D F Ransohoff; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The effect of media and temperature on the storage of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S L Aarnaes; E M Peterson; L M De La Maza
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Performance of a nonisotopic DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; H G Niesters; J W Mouton; W G Quint; J A Ijpelaar; J H Van Rijsoort-Vos; L Habbema; E Stolz; M F Michel; J H Wagenvoort
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; J B Mahony; S Castriciano; M Mores; I O Stewart; S J Landis; W Seidelman; E J Sargeant; C Leman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia test, Chlamydiazyme, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with a low prevalence of infection.

Authors:  M Skulnick; G W Small; A E Simor; D E Low; H Khosid; S Fraser; R Chua
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Underdiagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Diagnostic limitations in patients with low-level infection.

Authors:  J S Lin; W E Jones; L Yan; K A Wirthwein; E E Flaherty; R M Haivanis; P A Rice
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  14 in total

1.  Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.

Authors:  W J Newhall; R E Johnson; S DeLisle; D Fine; A Hadgu; B Matsuda; D Osmond; J Campbell; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Use of gen-probe probe competition assay as a supplement to probes for direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  G L Woods; D M Garza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Improved performance of PACE 2 with modified collection system in combination with probe competition assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urethral specimens from males.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; W H Goessens; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; H G Niesters; E Stolz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of the PACE 2 assay, two amplification assays, and Clearview EIA for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in female endocervical and urine specimens.

Authors:  T L Lauderdale; L Landers; I Thorneycroft; K Chapin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urethral and urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic male patients by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  A Stary; B Choueiri; I Hörting-Müller; P Halisch; L Teodorowicz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Evaluation of nucleic acid-based test (PACE 2C) for simultaneous detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  P C Iwen; R A Walker; K L Warren; D M Kelly; S H Hinrichs; J Linder
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for purified Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid.

Authors:  J G Kuipers; K Scharmann; J Wollenhaupt; E Nettelnbreker; S Hopf; H Zeidler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among low- and high-risk Filipino women and performance of Chlamydia rapid tests in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Francis Saison; Lourdes Mahilum-Tapay; Claude-Edouard E Michel; Nigel D Buttress; Elpidio Cesar B Nadala; Jose Paolo V Magbanua; Emma M Harding-Esch; M Odeta Villaruel; Lorna Canong; Rey L Celis; Helen H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in women attending a family planning clinic in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  J J Theunissen; G Kariwiga; J M Ossewaarde; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; E Stolz; W I van der Meijden
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1995-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.