Literature DB >> 8839640

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urethral and urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic male patients by the polymerase chain reaction.

A Stary1, B Choueiri, I Hörting-Müller, P Halisch, L Teodorowicz.   

Abstract

To evaluate the commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay Amplicor (Roche Molecular Systems, USA) for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection, urethral and urine swabs from a total of 344 male patients were tested and the results compared with those obtained by the nonisotopic hybridization assay Pace 2 (Gen Probe, USA) for urethral samples and by the enzyme immunoassay EIA MicroTrak (Syva, USA) for urine. Discrepant results were analyzed by a repeated test run using a major outer membrane protein-derived primer PCR, by the probe competition assay, and by the direct immunofluorescence test (DIF). Thirty-nine men (11.3%) were chlamydia positive, based on the results of all tests from both sampling sites. The rate of detection of chlamydia in urethral specimens by Amplicor and the Pace 2 was 79.5% and 61.5%, respectively, while the rate of detection in urine sediment was 75% for both Amplicor and EIA. In the first run of the PCR, a high number of false-negative results for unfrozen samples was observed, decreasing the sensitivity of Amplicor in urine to 47.3%. The results of the study indicate that Amplicor detects more infected individuals compared with other tests and is suitable as an alternative diagnostic test for chlamydia infections, using not only urethral specimens but also urine specimens. However, the finding of false-negative results when using Amplicor on unfrozen samples must be further investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8839640     DOI: 10.1007/bf01691313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  35 in total

1.  The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Evaluation of culture and the Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens transported to a state health laboratory.

Authors:  R J Limberger; R Biega; A Evancoe; L McCarthy; L Slivienski; M Kirkwood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  L Bobo; F Coutlee; R H Yolken; T Quinn; R P Viscidi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 system, direct fluorescent-antibody, and cell culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens.

Authors:  P C Iwen; T M Blair; G L Woods
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Culture versus direct specimen test: comparative study of infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in Viennese prostitutes.

Authors:  A Stary; W Kopp; W Gebhart; J Söltz-Szöts
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1985-08

6.  Transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis among sex partners assessed by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  R P Viscidi; L Bobo; E W Hook; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Performance of a nonisotopic DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; H G Niesters; J W Mouton; W G Quint; J A Ijpelaar; J H Van Rijsoort-Vos; L Habbema; E Stolz; M F Michel; J H Wagenvoort
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; J B Mahony; S Castriciano; M Mores; I O Stewart; S J Landis; W Seidelman; E J Sargeant; C Leman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in military personnel by urine testing.

Authors:  A Stary; K Steyrer; C Heller-Vitouch; I Müller; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Urine and the laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in males.

Authors:  T W Kok; L E Payne; S E Bailey; R G Waddell
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1993-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  M Puolakkainen; E Hiltunen-Back; T Reunala; S Suhonen; P Lähteenmäki; M Lehtinen; J Paavonen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.

Authors:  J Mahony; S Chong; D Jang; K Luinstra; M Faught; D Dalby; J Sellors; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.