Literature DB >> 3517035

Comparison of monoclonal antibody staining and culture in diagnosing cervical chlamydial infection.

E S Lipkin, J V Moncada, M A Shafer, T E Wilson, J Schachter.   

Abstract

We compared a fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibody (FA) direct specimen test (MicroTrak; Syva Co., Palo Alto, Calif.) with culture (TC) in McCoy cells (vials, with blind passage and iodine staining of inclusions) for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the cervix. Duplicate specimens were collected from 1,230 women, but for 262 of these subjects, both results were unavailable (150 FA smears were inadequate, indicating a need for clinical training in specimen collection), leaving 968 comparisons. Prevalence of chlamydiae by culture was 13% (126/968). Compared with TC results, the sensitivity of FA was 70% (88/126) and the specificity was 94% (795/842). There was a 91% agreement (883/968). The predictive value of a positive FA test was 65% (88/135), and that of a negative FA was 95% (795/833). We reexamined 38 smears for which paired results were discrepant, and the reread would have changed the result in only 5 of these. TC is less than 100% sensitive and some FA-positive, TC-negative specimens represent positive specimens not detected by TC. Unfortunately, it is not possible to identify which results in this group are truly false-positive. Clearly, the FA procedure has a performance profile which would make it a useful tool in screening high-risk populations (particularly when TC is not available) but it is less suited to screening low-risk populations, for which false-positive results are more important. The greater utility of the FA procedure in a venereal disease clinic was confirmed by testing 172 evaluable specimen pairs, of which 34 (20%) were Chlamydia isolate positive. The FA sensitivity was 76% (26/34) and specificity was 96% (133/138), giving a predictive value of 84% (26/31) for a positive test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3517035      PMCID: PMC268582          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.23.1.114-117.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

Review 1.  Chlamydial infections (third of three parts).

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation.

Authors:  B J Thomas; R T Evans; D A Hawkins; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Culture-independent diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  M R Tam; W E Stamm; H H Handsfield; R Stephens; C C Kuo; K K Holmes; K Ditzenberger; M Krieger; R C Nowinski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Rapid diagnosis of chlamydial infections with the MicroTrak direct test.

Authors:  C T Uyeda; P Welborn; N Ellison-Birang; K Shunk; B Tsaouse
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Chlamydial infections.

Authors:  J Schachter; M Grossman
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 13.739

6.  Chlamydial infections. What should we do while waiting for a diagnostic test?

Authors:  W E Stamm; K K Holmes
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1981-09

7.  The Chlamydia epidemic.

Authors:  K K Holmes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretions. A multicenter trial.

Authors:  W E Stamm; H R Harrison; E R Alexander; L D Cles; M R Spence; T C Quinn
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells.

Authors:  K T Ripa; P A Mårdh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Monoclonal antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis: antibody specificities and antigen characterization.

Authors:  R S Stephens; M R Tam; C C Kuo; R C Nowinski
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.422

  10 in total
  32 in total

1.  Accuracy of two enzyme immunoassays and cell culture in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in low and high risk populations in Senegal.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; N Samb; A D Sarr; L Van de Velden; J Moran; S Mboup; I Ndoye; J L Lamboray; A Meheus; P Piot
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Use of sequential enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescent antibody tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.

Authors:  J R Schwebke; W E Stamm; H H Handsfield
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Utility of pooled urine specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in men attending public sexually transmitted infection clinics in Mumbai, India, by PCR.

Authors:  Christina Lindan; Meenakshi Mathur; Sameer Kumta; Hermangi Jerajani; Alka Gogate; Julius Schachter; Jeanne Moncada
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

5.  Evaluation of the rapid CLEARVIEW Chlamydia test for direct detection of chlamydiae from cervical specimens.

Authors:  N J Stratton; L Hirsch; F Harris; L M de la Maza; E M Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; C L Murray; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of cell culture with two direct Chlamydia tests using immunofluorescence or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  P Pothier; A Kazmierczak
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Effect of blind passage and multiple sampling on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from urogenital specimens.

Authors:  R B Jones; B P Katz; B van der Pol; V A Caine; B E Batteiger; W J Newhall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

Authors:  C J Hall; C Nelder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.