Literature DB >> 8279593

Promoting mammography use through progressive interventions: is it effective?

E S King1, B K Rimer, J Seay, A Balshem, P F Engstrom.   

Abstract

This study evaluated interventions implemented with women in a health maintenance organization who had not utilized their annual free mammogram referral 45 days (step 2) and 95 days (step 3) after its mailing. The step 2 evaluation compared mammography utilization for women randomly assigned to receive a brief reminder letter or no reminder: 42% of the reminder group vs 28% of the control group obtained mammograms. The step 3 evaluation compared utilization for women randomly assigned to receive a second reminder, a letter suggesting a preventive office visit, or telephone counseling: 29% of those who received telephone counseling, 14% of those who received a letter, and 12% of those who received a second reminder obtained mammograms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8279593      PMCID: PMC1614897          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.1.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  5 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Integrating behavior and intention regarding mammography by respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.

Authors:  W Rakowski; B K Rimer; S A Bryant
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1983-06

4.  Some reasons for compliance and noncompliance in a health maintenance organization breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  B K Rimer; S W Davis; P F Engstrom; R E Myers; J R Rosan
Journal:  J Compliance Health Care       Date:  1988

5.  Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers.

Authors:  B K Rimer; M K Keintz; H B Kessler; P F Engstrom; J R Rosan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

  5 in total
  29 in total

1.  Development of a cervical cancer control intervention program for Cambodian American women.

Authors:  J Carey Jackson; V M Taylor; K Chitnarong; J Mahloch; M Fischer; R Sam; P Seng
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-10

2.  Effectiveness of a worksite intervention to reduce an occupational exposure: the Minnesota wood dust study.

Authors:  DeAnn Lazovich; David L Parker; Lisa M Brosseau; F Thomas Milton; Siobhan K Dugan; Wei Pan; Lynette Hock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The Italian health surveillance (SiVeAS) prioritization approach to reduce chronic disease risk factors.

Authors:  Eduardo J Simoes; Sergio Mariotti; Alessandra Rossi; Alicia Heim; Felipe Lobello; Ali H Mokdad; Emanuele Scafato
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Development of cervical cancer control interventions for Chinese immigrants.

Authors:  J Carey Jackson; Hoai Do; Kamolthip Chitnarong; Shin-Ping Tu; Ann Marchand; Gregory Hislop; Vicky Taylor
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2002-07

5.  Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Casey L Luce; Evette Ludman; Amy E Bonomi; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls.

Authors:  P M Lantz; D Stencil; M T Lippert; S Beversdorf; L Jaros; P L Remington
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Recommendations for a culturally-responsive mindfulness-based intervention for African Americans.

Authors:  Natalie N Watson-Singleton; Angela R Black; Briana N Spivey
Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.446

Review 8.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

9.  Repeat mammography screening among unmarried women with and without a disability.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Michelle L Rogers; Xiaozhong Wen; Victoria Wilcox; Kate McCarthy-Barnett; Jeanne Panarace; Carol Manning; Susan Allen; William Rakowski
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2009-09-23

10.  Sexual orientation and intentions to obtain breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Stacey L Hart; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.