OBJECTIVE: Estimates of adherence to mammography screening guidelines vary, in part, due to lack of consensus on defining adherence. This study estimated adherence to repeat (two successive on-time screenings) and regular screening (three or more successive screenings) and evaluated the impact of varying operational definitions and evaluation periods. METHODS: The study included women aged 50-80 without a history of breast cancer who: were on a biennial screening cycle and due for a screening mammogram between 1995 and 1996; underwent screening (index date) in response to a reminder letter; and belonged to Group Health, an integrated health care delivery system in Washington State, for 6 or more years after the index date. Automated records provided information on enrollment, health care utilization, and procedures. RESULTS: Among 1336 women, 67-82% experienced a repeat screen. Adherence to regular screening over the 6-year evaluation period was 42-84%--and higher with longer allowable intervals between screenings, when definitions did not require on-schedule screenings, when intervals were reset after a diagnostic mammogram, and for shorter evaluation periods. CONCLUSION: Estimates of adherence to screening guidelines varied by the operational definition of "success" and time period of evaluation. Consensus in definitions and terminology is needed to compare evaluations.
OBJECTIVE: Estimates of adherence to mammography screening guidelines vary, in part, due to lack of consensus on defining adherence. This study estimated adherence to repeat (two successive on-time screenings) and regular screening (three or more successive screenings) and evaluated the impact of varying operational definitions and evaluation periods. METHODS: The study included women aged 50-80 without a history of breast cancer who: were on a biennial screening cycle and due for a screening mammogram between 1995 and 1996; underwent screening (index date) in response to a reminder letter; and belonged to Group Health, an integrated health care delivery system in Washington State, for 6 or more years after the index date. Automated records provided information on enrollment, health care utilization, and procedures. RESULTS: Among 1336 women, 67-82% experienced a repeat screen. Adherence to regular screening over the 6-year evaluation period was 42-84%--and higher with longer allowable intervals between screenings, when definitions did not require on-schedule screenings, when intervals were reset after a diagnostic mammogram, and for shorter evaluation periods. CONCLUSION: Estimates of adherence to screening guidelines varied by the operational definition of "success" and time period of evaluation. Consensus in definitions and terminology is needed to compare evaluations.
Authors: S H Taplin; W E Barlow; E Ludman; R MacLehos; D M Meyer; D Seger; D Herta; C Chin; S Curry Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Barbara K Rimer; Susan Halabi; Celette Sugg Skinner; Isaac M Lipkus; Tara S Strigo; Ellen B Kaplan; Gregory P Samsa Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Kimberly K Engelman; Edward F Ellerbeck; Matthew S Mayo; Samuel J Markello; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Prev Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Jennifer M Gierisch; Jo Anne Earp; Noel T Brewer; Barbara K Rimer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Celette Sugg Skinner; Adam Buchanan; Victoria Champion; Patrick Monahan; Susan Rawl; Jeffrey Springston; Zhao Qianqian; Sara Bourff Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2010-11-26
Authors: Rasmi G Nair; Simon J Craddock Lee; Emily Berry; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro; Celette Sugg Skinner Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Jennifer M Gierisch; Suzanne C O'Neill; Barbara K Rimer; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Celette Sugg Skinner Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Anna M Chiarelli Journal: Breast Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Martin Eklund; Kristine Broglio; Christina Yau; Jason T Connor; Allison Stover Fiscalini; Laura J Esserman Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2019-01-08