Literature DB >> 17698182

Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Denise M Boudreau1, Casey L Luce, Evette Ludman, Amy E Bonomi, Paul A Fishman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Estimates of adherence to mammography screening guidelines vary, in part, due to lack of consensus on defining adherence. This study estimated adherence to repeat (two successive on-time screenings) and regular screening (three or more successive screenings) and evaluated the impact of varying operational definitions and evaluation periods.
METHODS: The study included women aged 50-80 without a history of breast cancer who: were on a biennial screening cycle and due for a screening mammogram between 1995 and 1996; underwent screening (index date) in response to a reminder letter; and belonged to Group Health, an integrated health care delivery system in Washington State, for 6 or more years after the index date. Automated records provided information on enrollment, health care utilization, and procedures.
RESULTS: Among 1336 women, 67-82% experienced a repeat screen. Adherence to regular screening over the 6-year evaluation period was 42-84%--and higher with longer allowable intervals between screenings, when definitions did not require on-schedule screenings, when intervals were reset after a diagnostic mammogram, and for shorter evaluation periods.
CONCLUSION: Estimates of adherence to screening guidelines varied by the operational definition of "success" and time period of evaluation. Consensus in definitions and terminology is needed to compare evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698182      PMCID: PMC2065854          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  40 in total

1.  Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait.

Authors:  J L Fleiss
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study.

Authors:  S H Taplin; W E Barlow; E Ludman; R MacLehos; D M Meyer; D Seger; D Herta; C Chin; S Curry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  NCI remains committed to current mammography guidelines.

Authors:  Andrew C Von Eschenbach
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2002

4.  Factors associated with continued participation in mammography screening.

Authors:  J K Barr; A L Franks; N C Lee; P Herther; M Schachter
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months.

Authors:  Barbara K Rimer; Susan Halabi; Celette Sugg Skinner; Isaac M Lipkus; Tara S Strigo; Ellen B Kaplan; Gregory P Samsa
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Patterns of mammography use among Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic White women in New Mexico, 1994-1997.

Authors:  F D Gilliland; R D Rosenberg; W C Hunt; P Stauber; C R Key
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Promoting mammography: results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention.

Authors:  M E Costanza; A M Stoddard; R Luckmann; M J White; J Spitz Avrunin; L Clemow
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Factors associated with interval adherence to mammography screening in a population-based sample of New Hampshire women.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Beth G Harwood; Julie E Weiss; M Scottie Eliassen; Martha E Goodrich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Mammography facility characteristics and repeat mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Edward F Ellerbeck; Matthew S Mayo; Samuel J Markello; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  9 in total

1.  The demographic, system, and psychosocial origins of mammographic screening disparities: prediction of initiation versus maintenance screening among immigrant and non-immigrant women.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-08

2.  Longitudinal predictors of nonadherence to maintenance of mammography.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Jo Anne Earp; Noel T Brewer; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD.

Authors:  Celette Sugg Skinner; Adam Buchanan; Victoria Champion; Patrick Monahan; Susan Rawl; Jeffrey Springston; Zhao Qianqian; Sara Bourff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-26

4.  Standard definitions of adherence for infrequent yet repeated health behaviors.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Paul L Reiter; Barbara K Rimer; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

5.  Long-term Mammography Adherence among Uninsured Women Enrolled in the Breast Screening and Patient Navigation (BSPAN) Program.

Authors:  Rasmi G Nair; Simon J Craddock Lee; Emily Berry; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.090

6.  Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Suzanne C O'Neill; Barbara K Rimer; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Does perceived risk predict breast cancer screening use? Findings from a prospective cohort study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 8.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  The WISDOM Personalized Breast Cancer Screening Trial: Simulation Study to Assess Potential Bias and Analytic Approaches.

Authors:  Martin Eklund; Kristine Broglio; Christina Yau; Jason T Connor; Allison Stover Fiscalini; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-01-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.