Literature DB >> 8646651

Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

H D Davies1, E E Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To update the 1984 recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination on the routine screening of asymptomatic patients for infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. OPTIONS: Screening, with the use of culture or nonculture tests, of the general population, of certain high-risk groups or of all pregnant women; or no routine screening. OUTCOMES: Rates of asymptomatic and symptomatic chlamydial infection, perinatal complications, longterm complications of infection (i.e., pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility and ectopic pregnancy), coinfection with other sexually transmitted diseases, disease spread, hospital care, complications of therapy and costs of infection and of screening. EVIDENCE: Search of MEDLINE for articles published between Jan. 1, 1983, and Dec. 31, 1995, with the use of the major MeSH heading "chlamydial infections," references from recent review articles and recommendation by other organizations. VALUES: The evidence-based methods of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination were used. Advice from reviewers and experts and recommendations of other organizations were taken into consideration. Prevention of symptomatic disease and decreased overall costs were given high values. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: The greatest potential benefits of screening asymptomatic patients for chlamydial infections are the prevention of complications, especially infertility and perinatal complications, and the prevention of disease spread. There is no evidence that screening of the general population for chlamydial infections leads to a reduction in complications, and screening may increase costs. However, there is evidence that annual screening of selected high-risk groups and of pregnant women during the first trimester is beneficial in preventing symptoms and reducing the overall cost resulting from infection. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is fair evidence to support screening and treatment of pregnant women during the first trimester (grade B recommendation) as well as annual screening and treatment of high-risk groups (sexually active women less than 25 years of age, men or women with new or multiple sexual partners during the preceding year, women who use nonbarrier contraceptive methods and women who have symptoms of chlamydial infection: cervical friability, mucopurulent cervical discharge or intermenstrual bleeding; grade B recommendation). There is fair evidence to exclude routine screening of the general population (grade D recommendation). VALIDATION: These recommendations are similar to those of the US Preventive Services Task Force and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. SPONSOR: These guidelines were developed and endorsed by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, which is funded by Health Canada and the National Health Canada and the National Health Research and Development Program. The principal author (H.D.D.) was supported in part by the Ontario Ministry of Health and the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society Lilly Fellowship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8646651      PMCID: PMC1487928     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  184 in total

1.  An economic evaluation of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent males.

Authors:  M Genç; L Ruusuvaara; P A Mårdh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Screening urine with a leukocyte esterase strip and subsequent chlamydial testing of asymptomatic men attending primary care practitioners.

Authors:  J W Sellors; J B Mahony; L Pickard; D Jang; D Groves; K E Luinstra; M A Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Comparison of spiramycin and doxycycline for treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections.

Authors:  J Dylewski; B Clecner; J Dubois; C St-Pierre; G Murray; C Bouchard; R Phillips
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Double-blind comparison of two regimens in the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis. Seven-day vs 21-day course of triple tetracyclinc (Deteclo).

Authors:  I V Thambar; P D Simmons; R N Thin; S Darougar; P Yearsley
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1979-08

5.  Chlamydial infection of mothers and their infants.

Authors:  G T Frommell; R Rothenberg; S Wang; K McIntosh
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Health gains from screening for infection of the lower genital tract in women attending for termination of pregnancy.

Authors:  A L Blackwell; P D Thomas; K Wareham; S J Emery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-07-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Comparison of azithromycin and doxycycline in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis in men.

Authors:  P J Lister; T Balechandran; G L Ridgway; A J Robinson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Single-dose oral azithromycin versus seven-day doxycycline in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis in males.

Authors:  J Lauharanta; K Saarinen; M T Mustonen; H P Happonen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Prospective study of chlamydial infection in neonates.

Authors:  J Schachter; M Grossman; J Holt; R Sweet; E Goodner; J Mills
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-08-25       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome.

Authors:  S P Wang; D A Eschenbach; K K Holmes; G Wager; J T Grayston
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based case report: chlamydia infection in general practice.

Authors:  N R Hicks; M Dawes; M Fleminger; D Goldman; J Hamling; L J Hicks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-20

Review 2.  Counseling lesbian patients about getting pregnant.

Authors:  L S Steele; H Stratmann
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Sexually transmitted infections in Canada: A sticky situation.

Authors:  David N Fisman; Kevin B Laupland
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Chlamydial cervicitis: testing the practice guidelines for presumptive diagnosis.

Authors:  J Sellors; M Howard; L Pickard; D Jang; J Mahony; M Chernesky
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Azithromycin. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use as a single-dose regimen in the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.

Authors:  A P Lea; H M Lamb
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Reasons for testing women for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the Calgary region.

Authors:  Deirdre L Church; Ali Zentner; Heather Semeniuk; Elizabeth Henderson; Ron Read
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01

7. 

Authors:  Troy Grennan; Darrell H S Tan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Screening on urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Helena de Carvalho Gomes; Marcial Velasco-Garrido; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-12-29

9.  Benefits of opportunistic screening for sexually transmitted infections in primary care.

Authors:  Troy Grennan; Darrell H S Tan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Recommendation on screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in primary care for individuals not known to be at high risk.

Authors:  Ainsley Moore; Gregory Traversy; Donna L Reynolds; John J Riva; Guylène Thériault; Brenda J Wilson; Melissa Subnath; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 8.262

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.