Literature DB >> 12627288

Improved sensitivity of the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor assay using an optimized procedure for preparation of specimens.

C Niederhauser1, L Kaempf.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an improved sample preparation procedure that enhances the sensitivity of the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor assay (Roche, Switzerland). This procedure was developed after it was observed that, in some cases, endocervical swabs positive for Chlamydia trachomatis in a direct immunofluorescence assay were negative in the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor. For this procedure, the initial sample volume was increased over that recommended by the manufacturer, the sample was concentrated by centrifugation, and the yield of the extraction was increased by an additional enzymatic lysis. Five hundred sixteen endocervical swabs from women visiting a family planning clinic were tested in parallel by the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor using the extraction procedure recommended by the manufacturer and the modified in-house sample preparation procedure. Eight samples were positive with both procedures. Seven additional samples were positive with the in-house method only. The results show that the in-house sample preparation procedure markedly improves the test sensitivity of the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor assay. Consequently, the use of this improved screening protocol will facilitate the detection of even low-level infections with Chlamydia trachomatis, which in turn will lead to the introduction of earlier therapeutic interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12627288     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-002-0875-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  13 in total

1.  [Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: is the diagnostic efficacy good enough?].

Authors:  C Niederhauser; C Honegger; L Kaempf
Journal:  Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch       Date:  2000

2.  Evidence of labile inhibitors in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  A Clad; I Naudascher; U Flecken; H M Freidank; E E Petersen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Improved PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using an altered method of specimen transport and high-quality endocervical specimens.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J L Klinedinst; E S Stroll; S H Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Role of confirmatory PCRs in determining performance of Chlamydia Amplicor PCR with endocervical specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; L Pickard; S Chong; D Jang; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Evaluation of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test versus culture in genital samples in various prevalence populations.

Authors:  B de Barbeyrac; I Pellet; B Dutilh; C Bébéar; B Dumon; M Géniaux; C Bébéar
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-06

7.  Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from endocervical and urine specimens in an asymptomatic low-prevalence population of women.

Authors:  M Skulnick; R Chua; A E Simor; D E Low; H E Khosid; S Fraser; E Lyons; E A Legere; D A Kitching
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Influence of volume of sample processed on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital samples by PCR.

Authors:  W H Goessens; J A Kluytmans; N den Toom; T H van Rijsoort-Vos; B G Niesters; E Stolz; H A Verbrugh; W G Quint
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  J E Bauwens; A M Clark; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and suggestions for improving sensitivity.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of pooled urine samples and automated DNA isolation to achieve improved sensitivity and cost-effectiveness of large-scale testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.

Authors:  G I J G Rours; R P Verkooyen; H F M Willemse; E A E van der Zwaan; A van Belkum; R de Groot; H A Verbrugh; J M Ossewaarde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Achchhe L Patel; Divya Sachdev; Poonam Nagpal; Uma Chaudhry; Subash C Sonkar; Suman L Mendiratta; Daman Saluja
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.944

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.