Literature DB >> 7019235

Microtest procedure for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.

B L Yoder, W E Stamm, C M Koester, E R Alexander.   

Abstract

Management of patients potentially infected with Chlamydia trachomatis has been hampered by the cost and time required to perform Chlamydia cultures. To isolate C. trachomatis, we developed a microtiter method that exhibited equal sensitivity but less frequent contamination than our previously used vial-cover slip culture system. In addition, costs and technician time were substantially reduced with the microtest method. Subsequent studies showed that cycloheximide-treated cells were superior to 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine-treated cells in the microtest method and that a subpassage significantly enhanced the sensitivity of the method. The microtest method appears to be a sensitive, rapid, and economical method for isolating C. trachomatis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7019235      PMCID: PMC273945          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.13.6.1036-1039.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of various McCoy cell treatment procedures used for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  R T Evans; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Chlamydial infections (second of three parts).

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Detection of Chlamydia (Bedsonia) in certain infections of man. I. Laboratory procedures: comparison of yolk sac and cell culture for detection and isolation.

Authors:  F B Gordon; I A Harper; A L Quan; J D Treharne; R S Dwyer; J A Garland
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Infection of cell cultures by trachoma agent: enhancement by DEAE-dextran.

Authors:  T R Rota; R L Nichols
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Comparative recoveries of chlamydia from urethral specimens using glass vials and plastic microtiter plates.

Authors:  T F Smith
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Micro cell culture method for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  D E McComb; C I Puzniak
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

7.  Primary isolation of TRIC organisms in HeLa 229 cells treated with DEAE-dextran.

Authors:  C Kuo; S Wang; B B Wentworth; J T Grayston
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells.

Authors:  K T Ripa; P A Mårdh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine-treated cells.

Authors:  B B Wentworth; E R Alexander
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-05

10.  Use of gentamicin in the isolation of subgroup A Chlamydia.

Authors:  B B Wentworth
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  37 in total

1.  Isolation in endothelial cell cultures of chlamydia trachomatis LGV (Serovar L2) from a lymph node of a patient with suspected cat scratch disease.

Authors:  M Maurin; D Raoult
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of buffalo green monkey cells and McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis in a microtiter system.

Authors:  T Krech; M Bleckmann; R Paatz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparative trial of single-dose ciprofloxacin and ampicillin plus probenecid for treatment of gonococcal urethritis in men.

Authors:  R E Roddy; H H Handsfield; E W Hook
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Use of HL cells for improved isolation and passage of Chlamydia pneumoniae.

Authors:  L D Cles; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  In vitro evaluation of CP-62,993, erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline against Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  M Walsh; E W Kappus; T C Quinn
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Accuracy of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection methods in a low-prevalence population in a primary care setting.

Authors:  P H Gann; J E Herrmann; L Candib; R W Hudson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Micro direct inoculation method for the isolation and identification of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  D C Yong; N R Paul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Optimization of a rapid test by using fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  P Pouletty; J Martin; F Catalan; M Garcia-Gonzalez; I Morellet; S Bettinger; J Kadouche
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of cell culture with two direct Chlamydia tests using immunofluorescence or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  P Pothier; A Kazmierczak
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.

Authors:  L M Clarke; M F Sierra; B J Daidone; N Lopez; J M Covino; W M McCormack
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.