Literature DB >> 6189852

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in Mccoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.

W E Stamm, M Tam, M Koester, L Cles.   

Abstract

We compared two methods for identification of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy cell monolayers: conventional iodine staining and immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal antibodies against the species-specific major outer membrane protein antigen of C. trachomatis. Among 878 urethral and cervical specimens tested in parallel, the immunofluorescence method detected eightfold more inclusions per monolayer, identified a higher proportion of positive specimens on first passage (98 versus 62% by iodine staining; P less than 0.01), and improved overall sensitivity (98% of total positive specimens detected versus 84% by iodine staining; P less than 0.01). Improved sensitivity was most evident in specimens with low numbers of inclusions. Compared with conventional iodine staining, immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal antibodies improves sensitivity and offers more rapid detection of chlamydial inclusions in cell culture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6189852      PMCID: PMC272712          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.17.4.666-668.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Early detection of chlamydial inclusions combining the use of cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells and immunofluorescence staining.

Authors:  B J Thomas; R T Evans; G R Hutchinson; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Chlamydial infections. What should we do while waiting for a diagnostic test?

Authors:  W E Stamm; K K Holmes
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1981-09

3.  The Chlamydia epidemic.

Authors:  K K Holmes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Sensitivity of immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cell culture.

Authors:  R S Stephens; C C Kuo; M R Tam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Failure of serology in diagnosing chlamydial infections of the female genital tract.

Authors:  J Schachter; L Cles; R Ray; P A Hines
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Monoclonal antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis: antibody specificities and antigen characterization.

Authors:  R S Stephens; M R Tam; C C Kuo; R C Nowinski
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Cultural method for large-scale screening for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection.

Authors:  H Mallinson; S Sikotra; O P Arya
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total
  75 in total

1.  Evaluation of COBAS AMPLICOR (Roche): accuracy in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by coamplification of endocervical specimens.

Authors:  C H Livengood; J W Wrenn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Isolation in endothelial cell cultures of chlamydia trachomatis LGV (Serovar L2) from a lymph node of a patient with suspected cat scratch disease.

Authors:  M Maurin; D Raoult
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of two culture approaches, blind passage and dual observation, for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in various prevalence populations.

Authors:  S J Zimmerman; E Moses; N Sofat; W R Bartholomew; D Amsterdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  In vitro evaluation of activities of azithromycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline against Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae.

Authors:  L E Welsh; C A Gaydos; T C Quinn
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Antimicrobial susceptibility and serotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis strains isolated before and after treatment with ciprofloxacin and doxycycline.

Authors:  A H van der Willigen; T van Rijsoord-Vos; J H Wagenvoort; W E Stamm; R J Suchland; E Stolz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Accuracy of two enzyme immunoassays and cell culture in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in low and high risk populations in Senegal.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; N Samb; A D Sarr; L Van de Velden; J Moran; S Mboup; I Ndoye; J L Lamboray; A Meheus; P Piot
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Use of sequential enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescent antibody tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.

Authors:  J R Schwebke; W E Stamm; H H Handsfield
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of a chemiluminometric immunoassay with culture for diagnosis of chlamydial infections in infants.

Authors:  W Dumornay; P M Roblin; M Gelling; M R Hammerschlag; M Worku
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  T W Williams; S D Tyler; S Giercke; D R Pollard; P McNicol; K R Rozee
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Murine cytotoxic T lymphocytes induced following Chlamydia trachomatis intraperitoneal or genital tract infection respond to cells infected with multiple serovars.

Authors:  M N Starnbach; M J Bevan; M F Lampe
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.