Literature DB >> 8220364

Quality of life assessments and levels of decision making: differentiating objectives.

H J Sutherland1, J E Till.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine uses of quality of life (QOL) measurements at different levels of decision making within the health care system, ranging from the micro (clinical) level, through the meso (agency, institutional or regional) level to the macro and meta (governmental) levels. We use individualized, group and population-based QOL and preference assessments as illustrative examples of ways in which QOL information and decision making level interact. We conclude that the meso and macro levels pose particularly challenging problems, and suggest that, if the primary emphasis is placed on applications of QOL assessments at the micro (clinical) level of decision making, a research agenda that is much too limited may be adopted.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8220364     DOI: 10.1007/bf00434801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  21 in total

1.  Oregon's denial. Disabilities and quality of life.

Authors:  P T Menzel
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 2.  The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review.

Authors:  G M Kiebert; J C de Haes; C J van de Velde
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  The do-not-resuscitate order: outpatient experience and decision-making preferences.

Authors:  M H Ebell; M A Smith; K G Seifert; K Polsinelli
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; N F Boyd; P Warde; L Stolbach; J E Till
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

8.  Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  B J McNeil; R Weichselbaum; S G Pauker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Authors:  C A O'Boyle; H McGee; A Hickey; K O'Malley; C R Joyce
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  P J Selby; J A Chapman; J Etazadi-Amoli; D Dalley; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  17 in total

1.  Quality of life assessment in adults with type 1 Gaucher disease.

Authors:  B J Masek; K B Sims; C M Bove; M S Korson; P Short; D K Norman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Health-related quality of life: an indicator of quality of care?

Authors:  H F Treurniet; M L Essink-Bot; J P Mackenbach; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of life bibliography and indexes: 1993 update.

Authors:  R A Berzon; G P Simeon; R L Simpson; M A Donnelly; H H Tilson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.

Authors:  J E Till; D Osoba; J L Pater; J R Young
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Opinion polling and decision making: a critical appraisal of quality of life assessment.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; J E Till
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Improving Patient Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Analysis of HSRProj & RePORTER.

Authors:  Lynette Hammond Gerido; Zhe He
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2019-08-21

7.  Interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures through a philosophical lens.

Authors:  Jae Yung Kwon; Sally Thorne; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria B Boyce; John P Browne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Using Patient- and Family-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures Across Transitions of Care for Frail Older Adults Living at Home: A Meta-Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi; Lena Cuthbertson; Duncan Dixon; S Robin Cohen; Neil Hilliard; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2021-04-03

Review 10.  How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh; Kate Gooding; Elizabeth Gibbons; Sonia Dalkin; Judy Wright; Jose Valderas; Nick Black
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.