Literature DB >> 8044160

Opinion polling and decision making: a critical appraisal of quality of life assessment.

H J Sutherland1, J E Till.   

Abstract

The relationship between quality of life (QOL) assessments and decision making, in relation to the delivery of health services, is subjected to critical appraisal. Three levels of decision making in the health care system are taken into account in the analysis. Criticisms of opinion polling provide the basis for the appraisal. Examples of criticisms considered are: Might the use of QOL information be manipulative? Could the interviews or questionnaires used to obtain QOL data influence personal opinions? Are the methods used sometimes defective and/or superficial? Will QOL information always be used in decision making in ways that are ascertainable and justifiable? It is concluded that the time has come for the main focus of critical appraisal in QOL research to shift, from an emphasis on evaluation of the quality of methods used for assessments of QOL, toward an emphasis on the practical usefulness of QOL data.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8044160     DOI: 10.1007/bf00435258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  25 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis: is it ethical?

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Health policy in a new key: setting democratic priorities.

Authors:  B Jennings
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  1993

Review 3.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  The development of a method for determining oncology patients' emotional distress using linear analogue scales.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; P Walker; J E Till
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 5.  Quality of life assessments and levels of decision making: differentiating objectives.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; J E Till
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Do patients' evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state?

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; H J Sutherland; E C Thiel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Quality of life index for patients with cancer.

Authors:  G V Padilla; C Presant; M M Grant; G Metter; J Lipsett; F Heide
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Authors:  C A O'Boyle; H McGee; A Hickey; K O'Malley; C R Joyce
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Application of a general health policy model in the American health care crisis.

Authors:  R M Kaplan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Clinical trials in cancer: the role of surrogate patients in defining what constitutes an ethically acceptable clinical experiment.

Authors:  W J Mackillop; M J Palmer; B O'Sullivan; G K Ward; R Steele; G Dotsikas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of three quality of life measures in intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  J T Langfitt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.147

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.