Literature DB >> 1349111

Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement.

C A O'Boyle1, H McGee, A Hickey, K O'Malley, C R Joyce.   

Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) assessment is becoming increasingly important for measuring the impact of illnesses, diseases, and their treatment and for deciding priorities when allocating resources. We developed a novel method to measure QoL from the perspective of the individual patient. The schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life (SEIQoL) was devised from the technique known as judgment analysis to measure patients' level of functioning in five self-nominated facets of life and the relative weight or importance attached to these areas. We applied this method, together with traditional measures of health status, in a prospective intervention study of 20 patients undergoing unilateral total hip-replacement surgery with six-month follow-up by comparison with matched, non-patient controls. Health status was significantly improved by hip replacement on the McMaster health index questionnaire (p less than 0.001) and the arthritis impact measurement scales (p less than 0.001). Individually measured QoL was significantly increased after surgery when measured by SEIQoL (p less than 0.02). The individual nature of QoL was reflected in the variety of life areas nominated as important by individual patients, the differences in relative weights attached to these areas, and the complex nature of the changes that occurred postoperatively. Our data not only highlight such individuality but also show that SEIQoL provides a means by which this can be assessed scientifically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1349111     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90673-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  99 in total

Review 1.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Quality of life and neurological illness: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R Murrell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Are quality of life measures patient centred?

Authors:  A J Carr; I J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

5.  Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting.

Authors:  I J Higginson; A J Carr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

Review 6.  Measuring handicap: motives, methods, and a model.

Authors:  R H Harwood; S Jitapunkul; E Dickinson; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

7.  Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies.

Authors:  Geoffrey Norman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  A national study of the importance of oral health to life quality to inform scales of oral health related quality of life.

Authors:  C McGrath; R Bedi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Validation of the English version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire in a multi-ethnic Asian population.

Authors:  Wan C Tan; Justina W L Tan; Eric W L Wee; Matthew Niti; Tze P Ng
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Psychometric properties of the Spanish form of the Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation (SMiLE).

Authors:  Cristina Monforte-Royo; Joaquín Tomás-Sábado; Christian Villavicencio-Chávez; Albert Balaguer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.