Literature DB >> 3298297

Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

G W Torrance.   

Abstract

Quality of life is a broad concept that incorporates all aspects of an individual's existence. Health-related quality of life is a subset relating only to the health domain of that existence. The utility approach can be used to measure a single cardinal value, usually between 0 and 1, that reflects the health-related quality of life of the individual at a particular point in time. The utility approach is founded in modern utility theory, a normative rational model of decision-making under uncertainty. The measurement techniques that have been used include standard gamble, time trade-off, and rating scales. The techniques are described in the paper and compared in terms of their acceptability to subjects, reliability, precision, validity, and ease of use. It is concluded that the utility approach is beyond the experimental stage, and is now a viable alternative for investigators to use in measuring health-related quality of life.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3298297     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90019-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chronic Dis        ISSN: 0021-9681


  208 in total

1.  Do we know what global ratings of health-related quality of life measure?

Authors:  B Mozes; Y Maor; A Shmueli
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques.

Authors:  C Green; J Brazier; M Deverill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Bridging decision analytic modelling with a cross-sectional study. Application to Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M J Nuijten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The reproducibility of ophthalmic utility values.

Authors:  G C Brown; M M Brown; S Sharma; G Beauchamp; H Hollands
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

5.  More on patients' preferences in treating atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A Montgomery; T Fahey; J Protheroe; T J Peters
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-12

6.  The case for domains of function in quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Michelle J Naughton; Sally A Shumaker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  The development and use of quality-of-life measures to evaluate health outcomes in Japan.

Authors:  Shunichi Fukuhara; Naoki Ikegami; George W Torrance; Shuzo Nishimura; Michael Drummond; François Schubert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics.

Authors:  Ahmed M Bayoumi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Quality of life assessment in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  E J Irvine
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Estimation and comparison of derived preference scores from the SF-36 in lung transplant patients.

Authors:  Francis S Lobo; Cynthia R Gross; Barbara J Matthees
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.