Literature DB >> 8207143

Neural processing of musical timbre by musicians, nonmusicians, and musicians possessing absolute pitch.

G C Crummer1, J P Walton, J W Wayman, E C Hantz, R D Frisina.   

Abstract

Cognitive event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured during a timbre discrimination task from three subject groups varying in musical experience. The P3 component of the ERP was recorded from musicians with absolute pitch, musicians without absolute pitch, and nonmusicians during a task comprising timbres of varying difficulty. The three-timbre series, all of which consisted of the same pitch, were (1) string instruments in the same family (cello and viola), (2) flutes made of different materials (silver and wood), and (3) instruments of slightly different size (B-flat versus F tubas). The amplitude and latency of the P3 component varied systematically as a function of musical experience and type of timbre discrimination. The difficult timbre task resulted in mean P3 amplitudes which were larger for musicians relative to nonmusicians, however P3 amplitudes were similar for the two additional timbre series. The mean P3 latencies for musicians were shorter when compared to nonmusicians across all three series. In comparison, the AP subjects displayed the shortest mean P3 latencies, but had smaller P3 amplitudes relative to both musicians and nonmusicians. The implications of these findings suggest that perceptual tasks involving one of the fundamental building blocks of music, namely timbre, does elicit differential brain activity from memory or information processing systems from subjects with varying degrees of musical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8207143     DOI: 10.1121/1.409840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Event-related potentials to changes of rhythmic unit: differences between musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Pekcan Ungan; Türev Berki; Nurhan Erbil; Suha Yagcioglu; Mehmet Yüksel; Rezzan Utkucal
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study.

Authors:  Mari Tervaniemi; Viola Just; Stefan Koelsch; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cross-cultural music phrase processing: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Yun Nan; Thomas R Knösche; Stefan Zysset; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Domain-specific learning of grammatical structure in musical and phonological sequences.

Authors:  Benjamin Martin Bly; Ricardo E Carrión; Björn Rasch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-01

6.  Cortical processing of vowels and tones as measured by event-related desynchronization.

Authors:  C M Krause; H Lang; M Laine; M Kuusisto; B Pörn
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Enhanced cortical connectivity in absolute pitch musicians: a model for local hyperconnectivity.

Authors:  Psyche Loui; H Charles Li; Anja Hohmann; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Perceiving pitch absolutely: comparing absolute and relative pitch possessors in a pitch memory task.

Authors:  Katrin Schulze; Nadine Gaab; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.