Literature DB >> 15551089

Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study.

Mari Tervaniemi1, Viola Just, Stefan Koelsch, Andreas Widmann, Erich Schröger.   

Abstract

Previously, professional violin players were found to automatically discriminate tiny pitch changes, not discriminable by nonmusicians. The present study addressed the pitch processing accuracy in musicians with expertise in playing a wide selection of instruments (e.g., piano; wind and string instruments). Of specific interest was whether also musicians with such divergent backgrounds have facilitated accuracy in automatic and/or attentive levels of auditory processing. Thirteen professional musicians and 13 nonmusicians were presented with frequent standard sounds and rare deviant sounds (0.8, 2, or 4% higher in frequency). Auditory event-related potentials evoked by these sounds were recorded while first the subjects read a self-chosen book and second they indicated behaviorally the detection of sounds with deviant frequency. Musicians detected the pitch changes faster and more accurately than nonmusicians. The N2b and P3 responses recorded during attentive listening had larger amplitude in musicians than in nonmusicians. Interestingly, the superiority in pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians over nonmusicians was observed not only with the 0.8% but also with the 2% frequency changes. Moreover, also nonmusicians detected quite reliably the smallest pitch changes of 0.8%. However, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a recorded during a reading condition did not differentiate musicians and nonmusicians. These results suggest that musical expertise may exert its effects merely at attentive levels of processing and not necessarily already at the preattentive levels.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15551089     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2044-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians.

Authors:  S Koelsch; E Schröger; M Tervaniemi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-04-26       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Towards optimal recording and analysis of the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  J Sinkkonen; M Tervaniemi
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2000 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 3.  Auditory cortical plasticity: a comparison with other sensory systems.

Authors:  J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 4.  The brain that plays music and is changed by it.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Cortical plasticity and music.

Authors:  J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Superior formation of cortical memory traces for melodic patterns in musicians.

Authors:  M Tervaniemi; M Rytkönen; E Schröger; R J Ilmoniemi; R Näätänen
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Grouping of sequential sounds--an event-related potential study comparing musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Titia L van Zuijen; Elyse Sussman; István Winkler; Risto Näätänen; Mari Tervaniemi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory.

Authors:  H Tiitinen; P May; K Reinikainen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The accuracy of sound duration representation in the human brain determines the accuracy of behavioural perception.

Authors:  E Amenedo; C Escera
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  71 in total

1.  Event-related potentials to changes of rhythmic unit: differences between musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Pekcan Ungan; Türev Berki; Nurhan Erbil; Suha Yagcioglu; Mehmet Yüksel; Rezzan Utkucal
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  The "silent" imprint of musical training.

Authors:  Carina Klein; Franziskus Liem; Jürgen Hänggi; Stefan Elmer; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Double dissociation between rules and memory in music: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Robbin A Miranda; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Pitch discrimination learning: specificity for pitch and harmonic resolvability, and electrophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-04-12

8.  The impact of musical training and tone language experience on talker identification.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Emily Myers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-27

10.  Long-term implicit memory for sequential auditory patterns in humans.

Authors:  Roberta Bianco; Peter Mc Harrison; Mingyue Hu; Cora Bolger; Samantha Picken; Marcus T Pearce; Maria Chait
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.