Literature DB >> 8163971

Constrained acetabular components.

M J Anderson1, W R Murray, H B Skinner.   

Abstract

Between May 1987 and October 1990, 21 constrained acetabular components were used in revision total hip arthroplasty at the University of California, San Francisco. In 18 patients, the device was placed for a chronically dislocating total hip arthroplasty. In the remaining three, intraoperative instability during revision total hip arthroplasty necessitated its use. At the minimum 2-year follow-up evaluation (average, 31 months; range, 24-64 months), 15 patients (71%) experienced no further dislocations or subluxations. There were eight dislocations in the remaining six patients (29%). The average Harris hip score at the follow-up evaluation was 76 points (range, 32-100 points). For those patients who redislocated (n = 6), an increased acetabular abduction angle of the metallic acetabular cup, averaging 70 degrees, was the only predictive factor of failure of the constrained cup (P < .05). No radiographic or clinical evidence of loosening in the 19 porous ingrowth acetabular component was observed. This device will relieve the complication of severe hip instability in the majority of patients, but is not universally successful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8163971     DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90133-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  26 in total

1.  Constrained cups appear incapable of meeting the demands of revision THA.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Salim K Durrani; Molly M Usrey; Kenneth B Mathis; Nikolaos V Bardakos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; David J Biau; Denis Huten; Thierry Musset; François Gaucher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years.

Authors:  Remi Philippot; Jean Philippe Camilleri; Bertrand Boyer; Philippe Adam; Frederic Farizon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Efficacy of revision surgery for the dislocating total hip arthroplasty: report from a large community registry.

Authors:  Tiare Salassa; Daniel Hoeffel; Susan Mehle; Penny Tatman; Terence J Gioe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability.

Authors:  Olivier Guyen; Vincent Pibarot; Gualter Vaz; Christophe Chevillotte; Jacques Béjui-Hugues
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Are abductor muscle quality and previous revision surgery predictors of constrained liner failure in hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Loi'y H Mustafa; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups.

Authors:  Aron Grazioli; Eugene Teow Hin Ek; Hannes Andreas Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

9.  The focally constrained liner is a reasonable option for revision of unstable total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tatu J Mäkinen; Simcha G Fichman; Wael A Rahman; Tomas Amenabar; Oleg Safir; Allan E Gross; Paul R T Kuzyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Acetabular liner with focal constraint to prevent dislocation after THA.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Mihai H Vioreanu; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.