Literature DB >> 16094540

Isolated acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty: results at 5-9 years of follow-up.

Xiao-Dong Chen1, James P Waddell, Jane Morton, Emil H Schemitsch.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine whether isolated revision of the acetabular component can be successfully performed without disturbing the femoral stem and to determine the fate of the unrevised femoral stem following revision. Fifty-seven hips in 55 patients underwent isolated acetabular revision without removal of the femoral component. Thirty-three hips with minimal acetabular deficiency required no bone grafting; the remaining 24 hips were treated by morselized or structural allograft in addition to a new acetabular component. Twenty-two of these 24 hips demonstrated incorporation of the bone graft. A mean follow-up of 5.8 (5-9) years, all femoral and acetabular components were judged to be stable and well fixed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094540      PMCID: PMC3456643          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0674-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Femoral Component.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Garbuz; E Morsi; A E Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: failure of the metal-backed acetabular component.

Authors:  D J Astion; P Saluan; B N Stulberg; C M Rimnac; S Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Osteolysis: cause and effect.

Authors:  R K Sinha; A S Shanbhag; W J Maloney; C T Hasselman; H E Rubash
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1998

5.  Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; R E Magnus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of long-stem femoral components following revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J B Meding; M A Ritter; E M Keating; P M Faris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Removal and reinsertion of cemented femoral components during acetabular revision.

Authors:  E D Nabors; R Liebelt; D A Mattingly; B E Bierbaum
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A twenty to twenty-five-year follow-up note.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; E E Forest; J P Olejniczak; D D Goetz; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The noncemented porous-coated hip prosthesis. A three-year clinical follow-up study and roentgenographic analysis.

Authors:  R Bands; R R Pelker; J Shine; H Bradburn; R Margolis; J Leach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  Modular sleeves with ceramic heads in isolated acetabular cup revision in younger patients-laboratory and experimental analysis of suitability and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Peter Helwig; Lukas Konstantinidis; Anja Hirschmüller; Anke Bernstein; Oliver Hauschild; Norbert P Südkamp; Björn G Ochs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Roberto Civinini; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.

Authors:  Jan Schmolders; Max J Friedrich; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Andreas C Strauss; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Alumina heads minimize wear and femoral osteolysis progression after isolated simple acetabular revision.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Nicolas Dupuy; Olivier Pidet; Yashuhiro Homma; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Outcomes of isolated acetabular revision.

Authors:  Bryan M Lawless; William L Healy; Sanjeev Sharma; Richard Iorio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acetabular reconstruction using a free fibular autograft in total hip arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Thibaut Noailles; Chiaki Tanaka; Francois Lintz; Sylvie Collon; Kevin Bargoin; Francois Gouin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.