Literature DB >> 8113134

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. I: General characteristics.

C Köppl1, G A Manley.   

Abstract

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the external ear canal of the bobtail lizard were identified on the basis of their consistent presence, their temperature- and hypoxia-dependence, and their suppressibility by external tones. They were found in 86% of ears investigated, and each ear generated on average 10 emissions. Their sound-pressure levels lay between -10 and 9.3 dB SPL, and their centre frequencies between 0.93 and 4.61 kHz at 30 degrees C body temperature. Previous studies have shown that these frequencies are processed in the basal basilar-papillar segment by hair-cell areas that are strictly bidirectionally oriented and are covered by tectorial sallets. In contrast, no spontaneous otoacoustic emissions were found in the frequency range known to be processed by the apical, low-frequency segment of the basilar papilla. The mean frequency distance between emissions varied systematically across the frequency range in a way consistent with the hypothesis that they are generated by anatomically-defined groups of hair cells and their tectorial sallets. The 3dB-bandwidth of the emissions depended on their amplitude above the noise, but was at least 9 Hz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8113134     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90031-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  15 in total

1.  Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Frequency clustering in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from a lizard's ear.

Authors:  Andrej Vilfan; Thomas Duke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The effects of air pressure on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions of lizards.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-09

7.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  An active oscillator model describes the statistics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Florian Fruth; Frank Jülicher; Benjamin Lindner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Effects of salicylates and aminoglycosides on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the Tokay gecko.

Authors:  C E Stewart; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Interactions between hair cells shape spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a model of the tokay gecko's cochlea.

Authors:  Michael Gelfand; Oreste Piro; Marcelo O Magnasco; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.