Literature DB >> 21267311

The role of standardized risk assessment in the provision of prenatal care.

I J Parboosingh.   

Abstract

Errors in the provision of prenatal care are more likely to be the result of mental saturation than of inadequacies in the physician's fund of knowledge. To eliminate medical errors the physician should commit more time to the processing of clinical data. There are, however, limits to the physician's ability to handle large amounts of information in a busy clinic. This article outlines the benefits and limitations of risk scoring, and recommends the use of standardized risk assessment as a screening device to detect those pregnancies in need of further investigation or consultation with a specialist.

Year:  1986        PMID: 21267311      PMCID: PMC2328215     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  11 in total

1.  Quality-of-care appraisal in primary care: a quantitative method.

Authors:  J C Sibley; W O Spitzer; K V Rudnick; J D Bell; R D Bethune; D L Sackett; K Wright
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Continuing medical education. The philosphy and use of audit.

Authors:  D G Ashbaugh; R S McKean
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Prenatal and intrapartum high-risk screening. I. Prediction of the high-rish neonate.

Authors:  C J Hobel; M A Hyvarinen; D M Okada; W Oh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  High-risk obstetrics. II. Value of semiobjective grading system in identifying the vulnerable group.

Authors:  R E Nesbitt; R H Aubry
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1969-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  A simplified antepartum high-risk pregnancy scoring form: statistical analysis of 5459 cases.

Authors:  A T Coopland; L J Peddle; T F Baskett; R Rollwagen; A Simpson; E Parker
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-05-07       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Microcomputers in antenatal care: a feasibility study on the booking interview.

Authors:  R J Lilford; T Chard
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-08-22

7.  Problems and pitfalls of risk assessment in antenatal care.

Authors:  R J Lilford; T Chard
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-06

8.  Perinatal mortality and antepartum risk scoring.

Authors:  I Morrison; J Olsen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  An audit of antenatal care: the value of the first antenatal visit.

Authors:  P K Chng; M H Hall; I MacGillivray
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-01

10.  Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man.

Authors:  C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Rethinking risk.

Authors:  P F Hall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Antenatal Risk Scoring Systems in India to Predict Adverse Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Dinesh Raj Pallepogula; Adhisivam Bethou; Vishnu Bhat Ballambatu; Gowri Dorairajan; Ganesh Kumar Saya; Sureshkumar Kamalakannan; Sandhya Karra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-07-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.