Literature DB >> 2302643

Diagnosis of dystocia and management with cesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa-Carleton.

P J Stewart1, C Dulberg, A C Arnill, T Elmslie, P F Hall.   

Abstract

We carried out a chart review study to determine the rate of diagnosis of dystocia (abnormal progress) and the use of cesarean section to treat dystocia among 3887 primiparous women who gave birth to a single baby in the vertex presentation at four hospitals in Ottawa-Carleton in 1984. Of the 3740 women who had some labour 1127 (30.1%) were given a diagnosis of dystocia. Cesarean section for dystocia was done during all phases of labour (41% of procedures in the latent phase, 38% in the active phase and 21% in the second stage). The cesarean section rate varied among the hospitals from 11.8% to 19.6%. A total of 75% of the cesarean sections were for dystocia, disproportion or failed induction. The findings suggest that cesarean section is being done for disproportion without a trial of labour beyond the latent phase and for dystocia in the absence of fetal distress. If these practices were modified the cesarean section rate could be reduced from 16% to about 8%, the rate found in some other centres and that observed in Canada in the early 1970s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2302643      PMCID: PMC1451642     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  6 in total

1.  Active management of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia.

Authors:  K O'Driscoll; M Foley; D MacDonald
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  The increase in the cesarean birth rate.

Authors:  S F Bottoms; M G Rosen; R J Sokol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cesarean section: trends and morbidity.

Authors:  T F Baskett; R M McMillen
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in cesarean section rates.

Authors:  K O'Driscoll; M Foley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.

Authors:  S A Myers; N Gleicher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Caesarean section for dystocia: a comparison of practices in two countries.

Authors:  K H Sheehan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-03-07       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Rethinking risk.

Authors:  P F Hall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Consultation in family practice obstetrics.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M Murray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Profile of maternal and foetal complications during labour and delivery among women giving birth in hospitals in Matlab and Chandpur, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Fauzia Akhter Huda; Anisuddin Ahmed; Sushil Kanta Dasgupta; Musharrat Jahan; Jannatul Ferdous; Marge Koblinsky; Carine Ronsmans; Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Early versus Late Admission to Labor Affects Labor Progression and Risk of Cesarean Section in Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Jun Zhang; Jagteshwar Grewal; Linda C Chan; Antje Petersen; Mechthild M Gross
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2016-06-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.