Literature DB >> 33370361

High-risk pregnancies and their association with severe maternal morbidity in Nepal: A prospective cohort study.

Sushma Rajbanshi1, Mohd Noor Norhayati2, Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The early identification of pregnant women at risk of developing complications at birth is fundamental to antenatal care and an important strategy in preventing maternal death. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of high-risk pregnancies and explore the association between risk stratification and severe maternal morbidity.
METHODS: This hospital-based prospective cohort study included 346 pregnant women between 28-32 gestational weeks who were followed up after childbirth at Koshi Hospital in Nepal. The Malaysian antenatal risk stratification approach, which applies four color codes, was used: red and yellow denote high-risk women, while green and white indicate low-risk women based on maternal past and present medical and obstetric risk factors. The World Health Organization criteria were used to identify women with severe maternal morbidity. Multivariate confirmatory logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for possible confounders (age and mode of birth) and explore the association between risk stratification and severe maternal morbidity.
RESULTS: The prevalence of high-risk pregnancies was 14.4%. Based on the color-coded risk stratification, 7.5% of the women were categorized red, 6.9% yellow, 72.0% green, and 13.6% white. The women with high-risk pregnancies were 4.2 times more likely to develop severe maternal morbidity conditions during childbirth.
CONCLUSIONS: Although smaller in percentage, the chances of severe maternal morbidity among high-risk pregnancies were higher than those of low-risk pregnancies. This risk scoring approach shows the potential to predict severe maternal morbidity if routine screening is implemented at antenatal care services. Notwithstanding, unpredictable severe maternal morbidity events also occur among low-risk pregnant women, thus all pregnant women require vigilance and quality obstetrics care but high-risk pregnant women require specialized care and referral.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33370361      PMCID: PMC7769286          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  62 in total

1.  Did we do it right?--an evaluation of the colour coding system for antenatal care in Malaysia.

Authors:  J Ravindran; K Shamsuddin; S Selvaraju
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  2003-03

2.  Identification of high risk and low risk.

Authors:  M H Hall
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-03

3.  Antepartum identification of the fetus at risk.

Authors:  J W Goodwin; J T Dunne; B W Thomas
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1969-10-18       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Assessment of obstetric high risk factors in a developing country.

Authors:  C E Lennox
Journal:  Trop Doct       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 0.731

5.  Obstetric high risk screening and prediction of neonatal morbidity.

Authors:  M A Webster; S Linder-Pelz; J Martins; J Greenwell
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.100

6.  Assessing the Extent of Adherence to the Recommended Antenatal Care Content in Malaysia: Room for Improvement.

Authors:  Ping Ling Yeoh; Klaus Hornetz; Nor Izzah Ahmad Shauki; Maznah Dahlui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  What are the factors that interplay from normal pregnancy to near miss maternal morbidity in a Nigerian tertiary health care facility?

Authors:  Ikeola A Adeoye; Omotade O Ijarotimi; Adesegun O Fatusi
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2014-10-02

8.  The WHO maternal near-miss approach and the maternal severity index model (MSI): tools for assessing the management of severe maternal morbidity.

Authors:  Joao Paulo Souza; Jose Guilherme Cecatti; Samira M Haddad; Mary Angela Parpinelli; Maria Laura Costa; Leila Katz; Lale Say
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Delays in receiving obstetric care and poor maternal outcomes: results from a national multicentre cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rodolfo C Pacagnella; José G Cecatti; Mary A Parpinelli; Maria H Sousa; Samira M Haddad; Maria L Costa; João P Souza; Robert C Pattinson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Factors associated with severe maternal morbidity in Kelantan, Malaysia: A comparative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina; Abd Aziz Aniza; Zaharah Sulaiman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effect of individual counseling based on the GATHER principles on perceived stress and empowerment of the mothers with high-risk pregnancies: an experimental study.

Authors:  Sahar Aliabadi; Arezoo Shayan; Mansoureh Refaei; Leili Tapak; Latif Moradveisi
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.144

2.  Prevalence of adverse birth outcomes and associated factors in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Fatimah H Dallak; Ibrahim M Gosadi; Wejdan N Haidar; Amjad A Durayb; Abeer R Alomaish; Atheer H Alshamakhi; Raoud M Khormi; Ali H Almudeer; Majed A Alibrahim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Identification and mitigation of high-risk pregnancy with the Community Maternal Danger Score Mobile Application in Gboko, Nigeria.

Authors:  Rajan Bola; Fanan Ujoh; Ronald Lett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  A Qualitative Study to Explore the Barriers for Nonadherence to Referral to Hospital Births by Women with High-Risk Pregnancies in Nepal.

Authors:  Sushma Rajbanshi; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Perceptions of Good-Quality Antenatal Care and Birthing Services among Postpartum Women in Nepal.

Authors:  Sushma Rajbanshi; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.