Literature DB >> 8075186

How many screens does a CT workstation need?

D V Beard1, B M Hemminger, K M Denelsbeck, R E Johnston.   

Abstract

A considerable number of prototype and commercial workstations have been developed during the last 10 years for electronic display of computed tomographic (CT) images during clinical interpretation. These CT workstations have varied widely in the number and size of monitors available for the display of the medical images ranging from a single 1,024 x 1,204-pixel monitor, to eight 2,500 x 2,000-pixel monitors. Image display times also have varied considerably, ranging from as fast as .11 seconds, to as slow as 26 seconds to fill a single monitor. No consensus has formed in the workstation community with regard to display area and response time requirements. To address this issue, we have constructed a time-motion model of CT interpretation. Model accuracy is experimentally verified with three workstations as well as with the film alternator. In general, CT interpretations with an electronic workstation become faster as display area increases and display time decreases. Results can be used by workstation designers and purchasers to roughly estimate differences in interpretation speeds among contending CT workstation designs.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8075186     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  13 in total

1.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.

Authors:  P M FITTS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-06

3.  MR examination of the knee: interpretation with multiscreen digital workstation vs hardcopy format.

Authors:  J J Brown; S C Malchow; W G Totty; A J Wilson; J K Lee; M W Vannier; R G Jost
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  A cost analysis of film image management and four PACS based on different network protocols.

Authors:  D Beard; D Parrish; D Stevenson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Evaluation of a PACS workstation for assessment of body CT studies.

Authors:  K S Berbaum; E A Franken; H Honda; C McGuire; R R Weis; T Barloon
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment.

Authors:  W H Straub; D Gur; W F Good; W L Campbell; P L Davis; S T Hecht; M L Skolnick; F L Thaete; M S Rosenthal; D Sashin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The digital imaging workstation.

Authors:  R L Arenson; D P Chakraborty; S B Seshadri; H L Kundel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Interpretation of CT studies: single-screen workstation versus film alternator.

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; J R Perry; M A Mauro; K E Muller; D M Warshauer; M A Smith; A J Zito
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; E D Pisano; K M Denelsbeck; D M Warshauer; M A Mauro; B Keefe; W H McCartney; C B Wilcox
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Designing a radiology workstation: a focus on navigation during the interpretation task.

Authors:  D Beard
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  4 in total

1.  A picture archiving and communications system featuring multiple monitors using Windows98.

Authors:  R Ernst; V T Le; A Kawashima; C Caskey; D Zelitt; E Tamm; C M Sandler
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Evolution of the digital revolution: a radiologist perspective.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel; Khan Siddiqui
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Processes involved in reading imaging studies: workflow analysis and implications for workstation development.

Authors:  S B Gay; A H Sobel; L Q Young; S J Dwyer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; E D Pisano; K M Denelsbeck; D M Warshauer; M A Mauro; B Keefe; W H McCartney; C B Wilcox
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.