Literature DB >> 7948172

Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.

D V Beard1, B M Hemminger, E D Pisano, K M Denelsbeck, D M Warshauer, M A Mauro, B Keefe, W H McCartney, C B Wilcox.   

Abstract

An ergonomically simple prototype workstation with two 900 x 1,100-pixel monitors capable of displaying eight full-resolution computed tomography (CT) images in 0.2 seconds, was compared with film for interpretation of computed tomographic images of the chest and abdomen. The hardware platform for this workstation cost less than $11,500 in 1993. A repeated-measures experiment was used to generate average interpretation times of 6.17 minutes for the workstation and 6.03 minutes for the film, including loading and unloading films, with three of the four subjects averaging about a minute longer for each workstation interpretation. All dictated reports were of clinically acceptable accuracy. All radiologists stated that workstations based on this design would be an acceptable clinical tool. However, observation suggested human working-memory strain among infrequent CT readers that could indicate the need for additional training. These data suggest that low-cost workstations can have practical application in interpretation of digital medical images such as CT, with the possibility of small increases in interpretation time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7948172     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

1.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.

Authors:  P M FITTS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-06

2.  A study of radiologists viewing multiple computed tomography examinations using an eyetracking device.

Authors:  D V Beard; R E Johnston; O Toki; C Wilcox
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  MR examination of the knee: interpretation with multiscreen digital workstation vs hardcopy format.

Authors:  J J Brown; S C Malchow; W G Totty; A J Wilson; J K Lee; M W Vannier; R G Jost
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  A cost analysis of film image management and four PACS based on different network protocols.

Authors:  D Beard; D Parrish; D Stevenson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Evaluation of a PACS workstation for assessment of body CT studies.

Authors:  K S Berbaum; E A Franken; H Honda; C McGuire; R R Weis; T Barloon
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment.

Authors:  W H Straub; D Gur; W F Good; W L Campbell; P L Davis; S T Hecht; M L Skolnick; F L Thaete; M S Rosenthal; D Sashin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Medical image work stations: functions and implementation.

Authors:  S M Pizer; D V Beard
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R A Abrams; S Kornblum; C E Wright; J E Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Designing a radiology workstation: a focus on navigation during the interpretation task.

Authors:  D Beard
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Effect of ambient light on electronically displayed medical images as measured by luminance-discrimination thresholds.

Authors:  D C Rogers; R E Johnston; S M Pizer
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  3 in total

1.  A picture archiving and communications system featuring multiple monitors using Windows98.

Authors:  R Ernst; V T Le; A Kawashima; C Caskey; D Zelitt; E Tamm; C M Sandler
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  How many screens does a CT workstation need?

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; K M Denelsbeck; R E Johnston
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Comparison of navigation techniques for large digital images.

Authors:  Bradley M Hemminger; Anne Bauers; Jian Yang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.056

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.