Literature DB >> 1994411

Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment.

W H Straub1, D Gur, W F Good, W L Campbell, P L Davis, S T Hecht, M L Skolnick, F L Thaete, M S Rosenthal, D Sashin.   

Abstract

Whether the display medium--film versus cathode ray tube (CRT)--affects observer performance during interpretation of computed tomographic (CT) images is an important research issue in these times of implementation and growth of picture archiving and communications systems in radiology. The authors performed a multiobserver receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study to determine the performance of radiologists who read abdominal CT studies displayed on film, as well as on a high-resolution workstation (video monitor) that made use of three different display modes. A total of 166 examinations were evaluated by eight radiologists, who recorded their ordinal confidence ratings of the demonstration of presence or absence of abdominal masses. ROC analysis showed small differences in the confidence ratings assigned by individual readers for the detection and interpretation tasks. Results for the group as a whole showed no significant reduction or improvement in observer performance when ratings for any one of the workstation display modes were analyzed. The results of this study demonstrate that current CRT display technology is adequate for enabling the primary detection of abdominal masses with CT examinations.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1994411     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.178.3.1994411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs.

Authors:  H Usami; M Ikeda; T Ishigaki; H Fukushima; K Shimamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Processes involved in reading imaging studies: workflow analysis and implications for workstation development.

Authors:  S B Gay; A H Sobel; L Q Young; S J Dwyer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Eye movement during computed tomography interpretation: eyetracker results and image display-time implications.

Authors:  D V Beard; E D Pisano; K M Denelsbeck; R E Johnston
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  How many screens does a CT workstation need?

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; K M Denelsbeck; R E Johnston
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; E D Pisano; K M Denelsbeck; D M Warshauer; M A Mauro; B Keefe; W H McCartney; C B Wilcox
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation.

Authors:  Rachel J Toomey; John T Ryan; Mark F McEntee; Michael G Evanoff; Dev P Chakraborty; Jonathan P McNulty; David J Manning; Edel M Thomas; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.