Literature DB >> 10342182

A picture archiving and communications system featuring multiple monitors using Windows98.

R Ernst1, V T Le, A Kawashima, C Caskey, D Zelitt, E Tamm, C M Sandler.   

Abstract

We present an effective approach to manage, review, and distribute Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images with multiple monitors using Windows98 (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA) that can be implemented in an office-based setting. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and angiographic DICOM images were collected, compressed, and stored using Medweb (Medweb, Inc, San Francisco, CA) software. The Medweb server used the Linux/UNIX operating system on a Pentium 333-MHz processor with 128 MB of RAM. Short-term storage capacity was about 2 weeks with routine usage of an 11-GB hard drive. Images were presented for reading on a dual-monitor Windows98 Pentium display station with 160 MB of RAM using a Medweb/Netscape (Netscape Communications Corp, Mountain View, CA) viewer. There was no significant discrepancy in diagnosis between electronic and conventional film images. Mean reading time for 32 cases was 118 seconds. The Medweb JAVA plug-in viewer loaded the first image within 30 seconds of selecting the case for review. Full uncompressed 16-bit images allowed different window settings to better assess for pathology. Multiple monitors allowed viewing various hanging protocols. Cine viewing was also possible. Key diagnostic images were electronically transmitted to referring physicians. On-call radiologists were able to access images through the Internet. By combining Medweb, DICOM, and web-browser software using desktop personal computers (PCs), an easily accessible picture archiving and communications system (PACS) is available to radiologists and referring physicians. Multiple monitors are easily configured and managed using Windows98. This system can sustain changes and can be extended to provide variable functions using inexpensive PCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10342182      PMCID: PMC3452922          DOI: 10.1007/BF03168771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  Preliminary time-flow study: comparison of interpretation times between PACS workstations and films.

Authors:  H Kato; G Kubota; K Kojima; N Hayashi; E Nishihara; H Kura; M Aizawa
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  Interpretation of CT studies: single-screen workstation versus film alternator.

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; J R Perry; M A Mauro; K E Muller; D M Warshauer; M A Smith; A J Zito
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  How many screens does a CT workstation need?

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; K M Denelsbeck; R E Johnston
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; E D Pisano; K M Denelsbeck; D M Warshauer; M A Mauro; B Keefe; W H McCartney; C B Wilcox
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  The magnetic resonance revolution in brain imaging: impact on neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  N J Robertson; J S Wyatt
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.