Literature DB >> 8055402

Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate.

R B Deber1.   

Abstract

How reasonable are expectations that patients will participate in care decisions? The previous article in this series reviewed models of the patient-physician relationship and views on the extent to which patients want to be informed; it also described one information tool--the interactive videodisc. This article reviews literature on the extent to which patients wish to be involved in making decisions about their care. Neither "sensitive paternalism" nor "informed consent" appears to be ideal. The author suggests a distinction between two elements of choice: problem solving and decision making. This distinction helps in identifying appropriate roles for patient and provider, thereby leading to genuine shared decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8055402      PMCID: PMC1337094     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  22 in total

1.  Outcomes research, cost containment, and the fear of health care rationing.

Authors:  J E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Patients may not recall disclosure of risk of death: implications for informed consent.

Authors:  T C Wade
Journal:  Med Sci Law       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.266

4.  Reluctant collaborators: do patients want to be involved in decisions concerning care?

Authors:  S Waterworth; K A Luker
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials: measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation.

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; M J McGreal; E C Thiel; S Fine; C Erlichman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  The relationship between patients' satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received.

Authors:  D S Brody; S M Miller; C E Lerman; D G Smith; C G Lazaro; M J Blum
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Factors affecting treatment decisions for a life-threatening illness: the case of medical treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  L A Siminoff; J H Fetting
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors.

Authors:  A E Beisecker; T D Beisecker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Preferences for treatment control among adults with cancer.

Authors:  L F Degner; C A Russell
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; J E Till
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  55 in total

1.  Good clinical practice and informed consent are inseparable.

Authors:  L Doyal
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions--challenges for doctors.

Authors:  Rebecca E Say; Richard Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

4.  The role of public opinion in drug resource allocation decisions.

Authors:  C A Melfi; B G Drake; W M Tierney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations.

Authors:  Raisa B Deber; Nancy Kraetschmer; Sara Urowitz; Natasha Sharpe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Studying the clinical encounter with the Adaptive Leadership framework.

Authors:  Donald E Bailey; Sharron L Docherty; Judith A Adams; Dana L Carthron; Kirsten Corazzini; Jennifer R Day; Elizabeth Neglia; Marcus Thygeson; Ruth A Anderson
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2012-08

7.  Shared decision making in the real world.

Authors:  R B Deber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Health literacy, numeracy, and other characteristics associated with hospitalized patients' preferences for involvement in decision making.

Authors:  Kathryn M Goggins; Kenneth A Wallston; Samuel Nwosu; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Liana Castel; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014

10.  Rochester Participatory Decision-Making Scale (RPAD): reliability and validity.

Authors:  Cleveland G Shields; Peter Franks; Kevin Fiscella; Sean Meldrum; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.