Literature DB >> 2586185

The relationship between patients' satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received.

D S Brody1, S M Miller, C E Lerman, D G Smith, C G Lazaro, M J Blum.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the relationship between patients' satisfaction with their physician, the types of interventions that patients reported they received, and the congruence between those interventions and the types of interventions they desired. One hundred eighteen symptomatic adult primary-care patients completed questionnaires before and after their respective medical visits. Patients who indicated they received any one of the three nontechnical interventions: education (P less than 0.001), stress counseling (P less than 0.05), and negotiation (P less than 0.01), were significantly more satisfied than those who had not received these interventions. Patient perceptions about receiving technical interventions, i.e., examination, tests, medications, and nondrug therapy, were not related to patient satisfaction. The congruence between patient-intervention desires and perceptions about interventions received generally were not significantly related to satisfaction except for the interaction between receiving a medication and postvisit-medication desires (P less than 0.001). A series of multiple regression analyses revealed that, in general, perceptions about nontechnical interventions were better predictors of patient satisfaction than perceptions about technical interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2586185     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198911000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  46 in total

1.  Patients' perspectives on the management of emotional distress in primary care settings.

Authors:  D S Brody; A A Khaliq; T L Thompson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patients' perceptions of omitted examinations and tests: A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; E J Callahan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Randomized trial of a web-based tool for prolapse: impact on patient understanding and provider counseling.

Authors:  Erinn M Myers; Barbara L Robinson; Elizabeth J Geller; Ellen Wells; Catherine A Matthews; Jacquia L Fenderson; Andrea K Crane; Mary Jannelli; AnnaMarie Connolly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Lise Rybowski; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Do the organizational reforms of general practice care meet users' concerns? The contribution of the Delphi method.

Authors:  Nicolas Krucien; Marc Le Vaillant; Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  The unexpected in primary care: a multicenter study on the emergence of unvoiced patient agenda.

Authors:  Michael Peltenburg; Joachim E Fischer; Ottomar Bahrs; Sandra van Dulmen; Atie van den Brink-Muinen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 7.  Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information.

Authors:  R B Deber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Irritable bowel syndrome patients' ideal expectations and recent experiences with healthcare providers: a national survey.

Authors:  Albena Halpert; Christine B Dalton; Olafur Palsson; Carolyn Morris; Yuming Hu; Shrikant Bangdiwala; Jane Hankins; Nancy Norton; Douglas A Drossman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  The feasibility and value of using patient satisfaction ratings to evaluate internal medicine residents.

Authors:  R Tamblyn; S Benaroya; L Snell; P McLeod; B Schnarch; M Abrahamowicz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Beyond informed consent: educating the patient.

Authors:  Lawrence H Brenner; Alison Tytell Brenner; Daniel Horowitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.