Literature DB >> 17678513

Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations.

Raisa B Deber1, Nancy Kraetschmer, Sara Urowitz, Natasha Sharpe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: What role do people want to play in treatment decision-making (DM)?
OBJECTIVE: Examine the role patients indicate they would prefer in making treatment decisions across multiple clinical settings in Ontario, Canada.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a series of survey/interview-based studies measuring preferred role, conducted in 12 different populations. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Respondents were outpatients, largely but not entirely attending outpatient clinics in large teaching hospitals in urban settings in the Province of Ontario, Canada. The subgroups and sample sizes were: breast cancer (202), prostate disease (202), fractures (202), continence (46), orthopaedic (111), rheumatology (56), multiple sclerosis (22), HIV/AIDS (431), infertility (454), benign prostatic hyperplasia (678) and cardiac disease (300), plus 50 healthy nursing students (for scale validation). MEASUREMENTS: All studies categorized preferred role using the Problem-Solving Decision-Making (PSDM) scale with one or both of the Current Health condition and Chest Pain vignettes.
RESULTS: Few respondents preferred an autonomous role (1.2% for the current health condition vignette and 0.7% for the chest pain vignette); most preferred shared DM (77.8% current health condition; 65.1% chest pain) or a passive role (20.3% current health condition; 34.1% chest pain). Familiarity with a clinical condition increases desire for a shared (as opposed to passive) role. Preferences for passive vs. shared roles varied across settings; older and less educated individuals were most likely to prefer passive roles.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite consumerist rhetoric among some bioethicists, very few respondents wish an autonomous role. Most wish to share DM with their providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17678513      PMCID: PMC5060407          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00441.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  44 in total

1.  Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making.

Authors:  Simon N Whitney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Building on the best--choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS.

Authors:  Zoë Lawrence
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Shared medical decision making.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Waggoner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  C Charles; S DeMaio
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.265

8.  Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians?

Authors:  Cathy A Charles; Tim Whelan; Amiram Gafni; Andy Willan; Sylvia Farrell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Patient understanding and satisfaction as predictors of compliance.

Authors:  S A Wartman; L L Morlock; F E Malitz; E A Palm
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate.

Authors:  R B Deber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  81 in total

1.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Patient participation in the discussions of options in Spanish primary care consultations.

Authors:  Roger Ruiz Moral; Lucía Peralta Munguía; Luis Ángel Pérula de Torres; Maria Teresa Carrión; Jorge Olloqui Mundet; Mariana Martínez
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Richard S Bedlack; Nanette Joyce; Gregory T Carter; Sabrina Paganoni; Chafic Karam
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  Evolution of Patient Decision-Making Regarding Medical Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Alexandra L Mathews; Adriana Coleska; Patricia B Burns; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Behind Closed Doors: What Happens when Patients and Providers Talk about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening?: Survey of the Effects of a Community-Based Intervention.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Pamela Williams-Piehota; Carla Bann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Pamela J Atherton; Tenbroeck Smith; Thomas F Hack; Mashele M Huschka; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Brent Diekmann; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  New elements for informed decision making: a qualitative study of older adults' views.

Authors:  Erika Leemann Price; Sylvia Bereknyei; Alma Kuby; Wendy Levinson; Clarence Henry Braddock
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-07-14

8.  Divided We Stand: The Collaborative Work of Patients and Providers in an Enigmatic Chronic Disease.

Authors:  Adrienne Pichon; Kayla Schiffer; Emma Horan; Bria Massey; Suzanne Bakken; Lena Mamykina; Noémie Elhadad
Journal:  Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact       Date:  2021-01

9.  Is Shared Decision Making a Utopian Dream or an Achievable Goal?

Authors:  Louisa Blair; France Légaré
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Consideration of shared decision making in nursing: a review of clinicians' perceptions and interventions.

Authors:  Noreen M Clark; Belinda W Nelson; Melissa A Valerio; Z Molly Gong; Judith C Taylor-Fishwick; Monica Fletcher
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2009-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.