Literature DB >> 2229694

Reluctant collaborators: do patients want to be involved in decisions concerning care?

S Waterworth1, K A Luker.   

Abstract

Against the background of the popularity of the concept of 'patient collaboration' in care, this paper describes, from the frame of reference of the patients, how they perceive being involved in decisions concerning their own treatment and nursing care. A convenience sample of 12 patients were selected. The data collection and analysis were informed to some extent by the approach known as grounded theory. Although only 12 in-depth interviews were conducted, one major theme emerged from the data and that was named 'toeing the line'. The data suggests that some patients are more concerned about doing what is right, that is, pleasing the nurse, than participating in decisions concerning care. It is contended that if nurses adopt practices which encourage involvement they may unwittingly coerse patients to comply. It is argued that patients will accept this situation even if they do not wish a collaborative role. Despite the small sample size, interesting questions are raised concerning the underlying rationale of patient involvement. The conclusion is drawn that promoting individualized care is not necessarily synonymous with active patient involvement as advocated in much of the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2229694     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01953.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  14 in total

1.  Nursing feature: in defence of the medical model.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1993-11

2.  Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  H-H Chiang; Y-M Yu Chao; Y-S Yuh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Safety and efficacy of physician-supervised self-managed C1 inhibitor replacement therapy.

Authors:  Louanne M Tourangeau; Anthony J Castaldo; Donna K Davis; James Koziol; Sandra C Christiansen; Bruce L Zuraw
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.749

4.  The 'Earlybird' gets the breastmilk: findings from an evaluation of combined professional and peer support groups to improve breastfeeding duration in the first eight weeks after birth.

Authors:  Sue Kruske; Virginia Schmied; Margaret Cook
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Bioethics for clinicians: 1. Consent.

Authors:  E Etchells; G Sharpe; P Walsh; J R Williams; P A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Patient reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim.

Authors:  Lynda C Doward; Ari Gnanasakthy; Mary G Baker
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 7.  Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate.

Authors:  R B Deber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Patient participation in decision-making on the introduction of home respiratory care: who does not participate?

Authors:  Päivi M Hämäläinen; Marja-Leena Perälä; Tuija Poussa; Marjaana Pelkonen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  The scope for the involvement of patients in their consultations with health professionals: rights, responsibilities and preferences of patients.

Authors:  S Buetow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  The combined effects of participatory styles of elderly patients and their physicians on satisfaction.

Authors:  K Tom Xu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.