Literature DB >> 3625576

The echolocation and hunting behavior of the bat, Pipistrellus kuhli.

H U Schnitzler, E Kalko, L Miller, A Surlykke.   

Abstract

The echolocation and hunting behavior of Pipistrellus kuhli was studied in the field using multi-exposure photography synchronized with high-speed tape recordings. During the search phase, the bats used 8-12 ms signals with sweeps (sweep width 3-6 kHz) and pulse intervals near 100 ms or less often near 200 ms. The bats seemed to have individual terminal frequencies that could lie between 35 and 40 kHz. The duty cycle of searching signals was about 8%. The flight speed of hunting bats was between 4.0 and 4.5 m/s. The bats reacted to insect prey at distances of about 70 to 120 cm. Given the flight speed, the detection distance was estimated to about 110 to 160 cm. Following detection the bat went into the approach phase where the FM sweep steepened (to about 60 kHz bandwidth) and the repetition rate increased (to about 30 Hz). The terminal phase or 'buzz', which indicates prey capture (or attempted capture), was composed of two sections. The first section contained signals similar to those in the approach phase except that the pulse duration decreased and the repetition rate increased. The second section was characterized by a sharp drop in the terminal frequency (to about 20 kHz) and by very short pulses (0.3 ms) at rates of up to 200 Hz. Near the beginning of the buzz the bat prepared for capturing the prey by extending the wings and forming a tail pouch. A pause of about 100 ms in sound emission after the buzz indicated a successful capture (Fig. 4).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3625576     DOI: 10.1007/BF00615246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  2 in total

1.  THE DETERMINATION OF DISTANCE BY ECHOLOCATING BATS.

Authors:  D A CAHLANDER; J J MCCUE; F A WEBSTER
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M B Fenton; M J O'Farrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  26 in total

1.  The influence of stimulus duration on the delay tuning of cortical neurons in the FM bat, Myotis lucifugus.

Authors:  H Tanaka; D Wong; I Taniguchi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Vespertilionid bats control the width of their biosonar sound beam dynamically during prey pursuit.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Joseph Kasnadi; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  The effect of pulse repetition rate on the delay sensitivity of neurons in the auditory cortex of the FM bat, Myotis lucifugus.

Authors:  D Wong; M Maekawa; H Tanaka
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Steering by hearing: a bat's acoustic gaze is linked to its flight motor output by a delayed, adaptive linear law.

Authors:  Kaushik Ghose; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Bats coordinate sonar and flight behavior as they forage in open and cluttered environments.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Fast sensory-motor reactions in echolocating bats to sudden changes during the final buzz and prey intercept.

Authors:  Cornelia Geberl; Signe Brinkløv; Lutz Wiegrebe; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Echolocating bats detect but misperceive a multidimensional incongruent acoustic stimulus.

Authors:  Sasha Danilovich; Gal Shalev; Arjan Boonman; Aya Goldshtein; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Echo SPL influences the ranging performance of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  A Denzinger; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  How greater mouse-eared bats deal with ambiguous echoic scenes.

Authors:  M L Melcón; Y Yovel; A Denzinger; H-U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.