Literature DB >> 20709932

Reliable detection of predator cues in afferent spike trains of a katydid under high background noise levels.

Manfred Hartbauer1, Gerald Radspieler, Heiner Römer.   

Abstract

Katydid receivers face the problem of detecting behaviourally relevant predatory cues from echolocating bats in the same frequency domain as their own conspecific mating signals. We therefore tested the hypothesis that katydids are able to detect the presence of insectivorous bats in spike discharges at early stages of nervous processing in the auditory pathway by using the temporal details characteristic for responses to echolocation sequences. Spike activity was recorded from an identified nerve cell (omega neuron) under both laboratory and field conditions. In the laboratory, the preparation was stimulated with sequences of bat calls at different repetition rates typical for the guild of insectivorous bats, in the presence of background noise. The omega cell fired brief high-frequency bursts of action potentials in response to each bat sound pulse. Repetition rates of 18 and 24 Hz of these pulses resulted in a suppression of activity resulting from background noise, thus facilitating the detection of bat calls. The spike activity typical for responses to bat echolocation contrasts to responses to background noise, producing different distributions of inter-spike intervals. This allowed development of a 'neuronal bat detector' algorithm, optimized to detect responses to bats in afferent spike trains. The algorithm was applied to more than 24 hours of outdoor omega-recordings performed either at a rainforest clearing with high bat activity or in rainforest understory, where bat activity was low. In 95% of cases, the algorithm detected a bat reliably, even under high background noise, and correctly rejected responses when an electronic bat detector showed no response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20709932      PMCID: PMC3971152          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.042432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  35 in total

Review 1.  Evolution and function of auditory systems in insects.

Authors:  A Stumpner; D von Helversen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2001-04

2.  Neuronal adaptation improves the recognition of temporal patterns in a grasshopper.

Authors:  B Ronacher; R M Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  In vivo Ca2+ dynamics in a cricket auditory neuron: an example of chemical computation.

Authors:  E C Sobel; D W Tank
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron.

Authors:  G S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation.

Authors:  S A Kick; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Structure, development, and evolution of insect auditory systems.

Authors:  D D Yager
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Ultrasonic signalling by a Bornean frog.

Authors:  Victoria S Arch; T Ulmar Grafe; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Substrate-gleaning versus aerial-hawking: plasticity in the foraging and echolocation behaviour of the long-eared bat, Myotis evotis.

Authors:  P A Faure; R M Barclay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones.

Authors:  P A Faure; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Erica L Morley; Gareth Jones; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Neurobiology of acoustically mediated predator detection.

Authors:  Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Acoustic signal perception in a noisy habitat: lessons from synchronising insects.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; M E Siegert; I Fertschai; H Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The cercal organ may provide singing tettigoniids a backup sensory system for the detection of eavesdropping bats.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Elisabeth Ofner; Viktoria Grossauer; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Neuronal correlates of a preference for leading signals in the synchronizing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; R Hashim; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Probing real sensory worlds of receivers with unsupervised clustering.

Authors:  Michael Pfeiffer; Manfred Hartbauer; Alexander B Lang; Wolfgang Maass; Heinrich Römer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Competition and cooperation in a synchronous bushcricket chorus.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; L Haitzinger; M Kainz; H Römer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Position-dependent hearing in three species of bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera).

Authors:  Reinhard Lakes-Harlan; Jan Scherberich
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  The heterospecific calling song can improve conspecific signal detection in a bushcricket species.

Authors:  Zainab A S Abdelatti; Manfred Hartbauer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.208

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.