Literature DB >> 8315370

The gleaning attacks of the northern long-eared bat, Myotis septentrionalis, are relatively inaudible to moths.

P A Faure1, J H Fullard, J W Dawson.   

Abstract

This study empirically tests the prediction that the echolocation calls of gleaning insectivorous bats (short duration, high frequency, low intensity) are acoustically mismatched to the ears of noctuid moths and are less detectable than those of aerially hawking bats. We recorded auditory receptor cell action potentials elicited in underwing moths (Catocala spp.) by echolocation calls emitted during gleaning attacks by Myotis septentrionalis (the northern long-eared bat) and during flights by the aerial hawker Myotis lucifugus (the little brown bat). The moth ear responds inconsistently and with fewer action potentials to the echolocation calls emitted by the gleaner, a situation that worsened when the moth's ear was covered by its wing (mimicking a moth resting on a surface). Calls emitted by the aerial-hawking bat elicited a significantly stronger spiking response from the moth ear. Moths with their ears covered by their wings maintained their relative hearing sensitivity at their best frequency range, the range used by most aerial insectivorous bats, but showed a pronounced deafness in the frequency range typically employed by gleaning bats. Our results (1) support the prediction that the echolocation calls of gleaners are acoustically inconspicuous to the ears of moths (and presumably other nocturnal tympanate insects), leaving the moths particularly vulnerable to predation, and (2) suggest that gleaners gain a foraging advantage against eared prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8315370     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.178.1.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  11 in total

1.  Variability of the approach phase of landing echolocating Greater Mouse-eared bats.

Authors:  Mariana L Melcón; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Body mass explains digestive traits in small vespertilionid bats.

Authors:  Iván Cabrera-Campos; Jorge D Carballo-Morales; Romeo A Saldaña-Vázquez; Federico Villalobos; Jorge Ayala-Berdon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Moth hearing in response to bat echolocation calls manipulated independently in time and frequency.

Authors:  G Jones; D A Waters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Cassandra Guignion
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Seasonal roost selection and activity of a remnant population of northern myotis in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Mattea A Lewis; Gregory G Turner; Michael R Scafini; Joseph S Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Can two streams of auditory information be processed simultaneously? Evidence from the gleaning bat Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  J R Barber; K A Razak; Z M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Gleaning bat echolocation calls do not elicit antipredator behaviour in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).

Authors:  Hannah M ter Hofstede; Joanne Killow; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Substrate-gleaning versus aerial-hawking: plasticity in the foraging and echolocation behaviour of the long-eared bat, Myotis evotis.

Authors:  P A Faure; R M Barclay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  The cercal organ may provide singing tettigoniids a backup sensory system for the detection of eavesdropping bats.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Elisabeth Ofner; Viktoria Grossauer; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Carbon (δ13C) and Nitrogen (δ15N) Stable Isotope Signatures in Bat Fur Indicate Swarming Sites Have Catchment Areas for Bats from Different Summering Areas.

Authors:  Jordi L Segers; Hugh G Broders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.