Literature DB >> 7991353

Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.

E Fox1.   

Abstract

The relation between distractor interference and negative priming from identical distractors was examined in two experiments. Subjects responded to a target letter, which was indicated by an adjacent bar marker, and attempted to ignore a distracting letter. On prime trials, distracting letters were either compatible or incompatible with the target, allowing for a measure of interference. On subsequent probe trials, previously ignored distractors were sometimes presented as targets, allowing for a measure of negative priming. Reducing the spatial separation between targets and distractors on the prime trial increased the magnitude of interference and negative priming, but these effects appeared to be independent of each other (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, the prime target location was precued on some trials, but not on others. Precuing attenuated the magnitude of interference, but not that of negative priming effects. This pattern indicates that measures of negative priming and measures of distractor interference on the immediately preceding trial are independent. The results are discussed in terms of a selective inhibition model of selective attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7991353     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  20 in total

1.  Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.

Authors:  L Paquet; C Lortie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

2.  The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

3.  Negative priming between response modalities: evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; G M MacQueen; J C Brehaut
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-01

4.  Evidence of reduced 'cognitive inhibition' in schizophrenia.

Authors:  A Beech; T Powell; J McWilliam; G Claridge
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1989-05

5.  Spatial factors in visual attention: some compensatory effects of location and time of arrival of nontargets.

Authors:  S E Gathercole; D E Broadbent
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Individual differences in negative priming: relations with schizotypal personality traits.

Authors:  A Beech; G Claridge
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1987-08

7.  Pre-cuing target location reduces interference but not negative priming from visual distractors.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1995-02

8.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Stimulus-response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference.

Authors:  L McClain
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-03

10.  Examination of some aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test.

Authors:  E C Dalrymple-Alford; B Budayer
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1966-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: evidence for early selection.

Authors:  L Paquet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.

Authors:  Carina Giesen; Christian Frings; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

3.  The control of visual attention and its influence on prioritized processing in a location negative priming paradigm.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Herbert Hagendorf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-07

4.  Multiple sources of positive- and negative-priming effects: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Henning Gibbons; Thomas H Rammsayer; Jutta Stahl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

5.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

6.  Negative priming depends on ease of selection.

Authors:  E Ruthruff; J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-07

Review 7.  The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Elaine Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

Review 8.  Relationship between social anxiety disorder and body dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Angela Fang; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-08-14

9.  Evidence inhibition responds reactively to the salience of distracting information during focused attention.

Authors:  Natalie Wyatt; Liana Machado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.