Literature DB >> 7644330

Negative priming depends on ease of selection.

E Ruthruff1, J Miller.   

Abstract

Negative priming effects have been offered as evidence that distractor stimuli are identified. We conducted two experiments to determine if such effects occur even when it is easy to discriminate target from distractor stimuli. In Experiment 1, we found the usual negative priming effect when target and distractor positions varied from trial to trail, but not when these positions remained fixed. Experiment 2 extended these results to a situation where the ease of selection varied only in the prime display. These findings argue that irrelevant inputs can be filtered out prior to stimulus identification under certain circumstances and therefore pose problems for strict late selection theories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7644330     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

2.  Early and late selection in partial report: evidence from degraded displays.

Authors:  D J Mewhort; E E Johns; S Coble
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-09

3.  Negative priming without probe selection.

Authors:  W T Neill; K M Terry; L A Valdes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

4.  Autonomic responses to shock-associated words in an unattended channel.

Authors:  R S Corteen; B Wood
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-08

5.  Pre-cuing target location reduces interference but not negative priming from visual distractors.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1995-02

6.  Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: where has all the inhibition gone?

Authors:  C M Moore
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

7.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Evidence against late selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects.

Authors:  S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11

10.  Examination of some aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test.

Authors:  E C Dalrymple-Alford; B Budayer
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1966-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Cross-language positive priming disappears, negative priming does not: evidence for two sources of selective inhibition.

Authors:  E Neumann; M S McCloskey; A C Felio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: evidence for early selection.

Authors:  L Paquet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming.

Authors:  Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

Review 4.  The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Elaine Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

5.  Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.