Literature DB >> 3444724

Spatial factors in visual attention: some compensatory effects of location and time of arrival of nontargets.

S E Gathercole1, D E Broadbent.   

Abstract

It is well established that the identity of nontarget events may affect reaction to a target event, but that spatial separation between the two will reduce such an influence. Two experiments are reported in which an attempt was made to distinguish between two accounts of this effect. On one, some of the information about events spatially distant from the target is shut out from analysis altogether. On the other, such events are fully analysed, but either the analysis proceeds more slowly or else it starts only after a delay. In the experiments the time of arrival of, and the distance between, the target and nontarget events were systematically varied. The conventional effects of the distance of nontargets from target were greatly reduced when the target and nontarget events were asynchronous. If the nontargets arrived first, they had an effect on reaction to the target whether they were near to or far from it. If they arrived second, their identity had no effect at either separation. These results appear to rule out any simple view of attention according to which information outside the target region is denied analysis. Rather, distant nontarget events are analysed, but produce their effects at a later time than less peripheral events.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3444724     DOI: 10.1068/p160433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  Perceptual processing of adjacent and nonadjacent tactile nontargets.

Authors:  P M Evans; J C Craig; M A Rinker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  Response competition: a major source of interference in a tactile identification task.

Authors:  P M Evans; J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

3.  The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

4.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

5.  Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.

Authors:  L Paquet; G L Craig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-03

Review 6.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.

Authors:  N Lavie; Y Tsal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

7.  Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

Review 8.  Visual search, visual streams, and visual architectures.

Authors:  M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-10

Review 9.  Extending the study of visual attention to a multisensory world (Charles W. Eriksen Special Issue).

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.