Literature DB >> 2243762

Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.

L Paquet1, C Lortie.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated whether uncertainty about target location and category overlap between the target and the flankers played a role in recent findings (Miller, 1987) of semantic interference of irrelevant stimuli. In each of four testing conditions, subjects were required to identify a target letter surrounded by irrelevant flankers whose identity predicted the correct response. We varied (1) whether or not the target location was precued, and (2) the flanker's category (digits vs. letters). We found a substantial effect of letter flankers when subjects were uncertain of the precise target location. However, this effect was greatly attenuated when attention was predirected to the target location. Similarly, a reduced flanker effect was observed when the flankers (digits) belonged to a different semantic category than the target. However, when the target location was precued, no effect of the semantic congruity of target and flankers was found. Coupled with previous research, these findings converge in establishing that both failures to maintain attention on the target location and the semantic congruity of target and flankers modulate the size of the effects from irrelevant stimuli. These results are discussed in the context of early and late selection views of selective attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2243762     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  20 in total

1.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J D St James
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

2.  Visual selective attention: introductory remarks.

Authors:  O Neumann; A H van der Heijden; D A Allport
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

3.  Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects.

Authors:  L Paquet; P M Merikle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Category effects in visual search: a failure to replicate the "oh-zero" phenomenon.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-09

5.  The cost of visual filtering.

Authors:  D Kahneman; A Treisman; J Burkell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Two stages in postcategorical filtering and selection.

Authors:  A H Van der Heijden; R Hagenaar; W Bloem
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-09

7.  The category effect in visual search depends on physical rather than conceptual differences.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-06

8.  Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.

Authors:  M C Smith; L E Magee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

9.  Global precedence in attention and decision.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Task combination and selective intake of information.

Authors:  D E Broadbent
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1982-07
View more
  10 in total

1.  The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the stroop flanker task.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Avishai Henik; Idit Spitzer-Davidson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

2.  Differences between digit naming and number word reading in a flanker task.

Authors:  Anja Ischebeck
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

3.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

4.  Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm.

Authors:  G Chastain; M Cheal; D Lyon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

5.  Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.

Authors:  L Paquet; G L Craig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-03

6.  Reducing color-color interference by optimizing selection for action.

Authors:  W La Heij; N A Kaptein; A C Kalff; L de Lange
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995

Review 7.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.

Authors:  N Lavie; Y Tsal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

8.  Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

9.  Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-07

10.  Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load.

Authors:  Hanna Benoni; Yehoshua Tsal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.