Literature DB >> 19045791

Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish.

Jianqiang Xiao1, Christopher B Braun.   

Abstract

A survey of papers using auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) published over the last 10 years (Table I) demonstrates that most AEP studies in animals have used subjective methods for auditory threshold determination. Subjective methods greatly reduce the value of statistical hypothesis testing and jeopardize tests of hypothetical experimental group differences in hearing sensitivity. Correspondingly, many attempts have been made to develop objective threshold determination methods, but these have not been used widely. Further, they seldom include an appreciation of the effects of residual noise in the AEP. In this study, AEPs evoked by tonal and noise stimuli in goldfish (Carassius auratus) were recorded and the residual background noise was measured and analyzed in detail. High variability was found in residual noise, but can be effectively controlled with a simple modification of averaging routines. Considerable interobserver disagreements were found using subjective threshold estimation. An objective method of threshold determination was developed based on comparison between AEP amplitude and controlled residual noise, using a signal detection theory approach to set specific threshold criteria. The usefulness of AEP in hypothesis testing for auditory function requires more control over residual background noise amplitudes and the use of objective threshold determination techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045791      PMCID: PMC2677356          DOI: 10.1121/1.2982366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Objective detection of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  E Stürzebecher; M Cebulla; K D Wernecke
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  2001

2.  Effects of a red-tide toxin on fish hearing.

Authors:  Z Lu; S M Tomchik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Auditory brainstem response threshold estimation: subjective threshold estimation by experienced clinicians in a computer simulation of the clinical test.

Authors:  Michael Vidler; David Parkert
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Evaluating residual background noise in human auditory brain-stem responses.

Authors:  M Don; C Elberling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: the use of noise estimate.

Authors:  P K Wong; R G Bickford
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-10

6.  Automated electrophysiologic hearing testing using a threshold-seeking algorithm.

Authors:  O Ozdamar; R E Delgado; R E Eilers; R C Urbano
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes.

Authors:  D A Mann; D M Higgs; W N Tavolga; M J Souza; A N Popper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Masked auditory thresholds in sciaenid fishes: a comparative study.

Authors:  John Ramcharitar; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Susceptibility to acoustic trauma in young and aged gerbils.

Authors:  Flint A Boettcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Empirical refinements applicable to the recording of fish sounds in small tanks.

Authors:  Tomonari Akamatsu; Tsuyoshi Okumura; Nicola Novarini; Hong Y Yan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Examining the hearing abilities of fishes.

Authors:  Arthur N Popper; Anthony D Hawkins; Olav Sand; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic particle motion detection in the snapping shrimp (Alpheus richardsoni).

Authors:  Jason P Dinh; Craig Radford
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Non-stimulus-evoked activity as a measure of neural noise in the frequency-following response.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Silvia Bonacina; Rembrandt Otto-Meyer; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.987

Review 4.  Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich; Richard R Fay
Journal:  Rev Fish Biol Fish       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.