Literature DB >> 7964342

What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation.

M Joffe1, J Chapple, C Paterson, R W Beard.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the consequences of different levels of caesarean section (CS) rate in terms of fetal and maternal outcomes.
DESIGN: Comparison of outcome variables between four categories of maternity units stratified according to CS rates. Data were collected concurrently. SETTINGS: All 17 maternity units in one health region.
SUBJECTS: Data for the perinatal mortality analysis: all 221,867 deliveries in 1983-87 (excluding severe malformations) (1462 deaths); maternity information analysis system: all 36,727 women with singleton pregnancies who delivered in 1988. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal mortality, Apgar scores at one and five minutes, onset of respiration after one minute, postnatal transfusion, postnatal infection, thromboembolism, low haemoglobin concentration at discharge, and puerperal psychosis were determined.
RESULTS: Teaching hospitals with an increased proportion of high risk cases had the highest CS rate, but the other three categories were found to serve comparable populations. Perinatal mortality showed a birthweight specific pattern--for very low birthweight infants, but not for other deliveries, mortality rates were lower in units with higher CS rates. Apgar scores showed no trend, but the onset of respiration after one minute was significantly more frequent in units with a CS rate of less than 10%. Increased maternal postnatal blood transfusion was associated with higher CS rates but no trend was observed for the other maternal variables.
CONCLUSIONS: CS rates in general maternity units should be 10 to 12% or lower in the singleton population as a whole, but a more interventionist approach is indicated for very low birthweight infants. If confirmed, these recommendations could easily be incorporated into clinical audit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7964342      PMCID: PMC1059992          DOI: 10.1136/jech.48.4.406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  17 in total

1.  Evaluating the quality of the maternity services--a discussion paper.

Authors:  C M Paterson; J C Chapple; R W Beard; M Joffe; P J Steer; C S Wright
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-11

2.  Assessment of an on-line computerized perinatal data collection and information system.

Authors:  M Maresh; A M Dawson; R W Beard
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-12

3.  Cesarean delivery in northeast region of Brazil, 1978-80.

Authors:  B Janowitz; W Rodrigues; D L Covington; J M Arruda; L Morris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Perinatal mortality: standardizing for birthweight is biased.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; I T Russell
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980.

Authors:  N Gleicher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Selection of an obstetric data base for a microcomputer and its use for on-line production of birth notification forms, discharge summaries and perinatal audit.

Authors:  M Maresh; R W Beard; D Combe; A M Dawson; M D Gillmer; G Smith; P J Steer
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-03

7.  Cesarean section, fetal monitoring, and perinatal mortality in California.

Authors:  R L Williams; W E Hawes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Relation of private or clinic care to the cesarean birth rate.

Authors:  R H de Regt; H L Minkoff; J Feldman; R H Schwarz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A failed RCT to determine the best method of delivery for very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  J Lumley; A Lester; P Renou; C Wood
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1985-06

10.  Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Associations between perinatal interventions and hospital stillbirth rates and neonatal mortality.

Authors:  R Joyce; R Webb; J L Peacock
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data.

Authors:  J Ye; J Zhang; R Mikolajczyk; M R Torloni; A M Gülmezoglu; A P Betran
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 6.531

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.