OBJECTIVE: A review of the use of computer collected audit data in assessing the quality of maternity services. SETTING: All maternity units managed by the North West Thames Regional Health Authority. RECOMMENDATIONS: A system of audit must supply information that is both credible and of interest to clinicians managers and consumers. The information should be adjusted for differences in populations to allow valid comparisons between units. It needs to be presented in an easily digested form. One way of implementing audit would be to establish a regional group representative of clinicians, patients and managers who would initially interpret the data and make recommendations. A local group of similar composition would be asked to comment on and respond to these with a plan for the following year. Changes would be monitored by analysis of the routinely collected data. CONCLUSIONS: Medical audit in the maternity services requires new concepts if it is to influence the quality of clinical care and the use of resources available to provide that care. The appropriate balance needs to be found between the perspectives of clinicians, patients and managers. A major challenge is the collection of valid data. This has largely been overcome by the St Mary's maternity information system. The next stage is to devise a system of audit that is epidemiologically sound and is acceptable to those who will be asked to implement the lessons that emerge. Only then will it be possible to determine whether clinical practice and the use of resources can be altered to the benefit of patients.
OBJECTIVE: A review of the use of computer collected audit data in assessing the quality of maternity services. SETTING: All maternity units managed by the North West Thames Regional Health Authority. RECOMMENDATIONS: A system of audit must supply information that is both credible and of interest to clinicians managers and consumers. The information should be adjusted for differences in populations to allow valid comparisons between units. It needs to be presented in an easily digested form. One way of implementing audit would be to establish a regional group representative of clinicians, patients and managers who would initially interpret the data and make recommendations. A local group of similar composition would be asked to comment on and respond to these with a plan for the following year. Changes would be monitored by analysis of the routinely collected data. CONCLUSIONS: Medical audit in the maternity services requires new concepts if it is to influence the quality of clinical care and the use of resources available to provide that care. The appropriate balance needs to be found between the perspectives of clinicians, patients and managers. A major challenge is the collection of valid data. This has largely been overcome by the St Mary's maternity information system. The next stage is to devise a system of audit that is epidemiologically sound and is acceptable to those who will be asked to implement the lessons that emerge. Only then will it be possible to determine whether clinical practice and the use of resources can be altered to the benefit of patients.
Authors: Lisa M Korst; Kimberly D Gregory; Michael C Lu; Carolina Reyes; Calvin J Hobel; Gilberto F Chavez Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2005-09
Authors: Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betran; Joao Paulo Souza; Mariana Widmer; Tomas Allen; Metin Gulmezoglu; Mario Merialdi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sally K Tracy; Alec Welsh; Bev Hall; Donna Hartz; Anne Lainchbury; Andrew Bisits; Jan White; Mark B Tracy Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 3.007