Literature DB >> 474842

Cesarean section, fetal monitoring, and perinatal mortality in California.

R L Williams, W E Hawes.   

Abstract

The rate of cesarean section in California has been growing at a compound rate of about 10 per cent per annum since 1969, coinciding with the advent of fetal monitoring. It is of interest, therefore, to study the distribution and efficacy of obstetric interventions. Information derived from the 1977 California birth cohort and a survey questionnaire was used to study the factors associated with the rate of cesarean section in 323 hospitals. Significant positive correlations were observed between the cesarean rate (CSR) and hospital factors indicative of a high degree of technology, including the proportion of labors electronically monitored. Significant negative correlations were observed between the CSR and hospital-specific variables suggestive of socioeconomically underprivileged patient populations. Other factors being constant, hospitals characterized by prepayment health care financing also had lower CSRs. A standaridized mortality ratio (SMR) based on 2.3 million births in the 1970--1976 cohorts was used to adjust the 1977 hospital specific perinatal mortality rates for birth weight, gestational age, sex, race, and plurality. The results show that hospitals which intervene technologically in a large proportion of births have lower risk adjusted perinatal mortality rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 474842      PMCID: PMC1619226          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  Fetal monitoring in a community hospital. A statistical analysis.

Authors:  J C Amato
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  A D Haverkamp; H E Thompson; J G McFee; C Cetrulo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Measuring the effectiveness of perinatal medical care.

Authors:  R L Williams
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section.

Authors:  M J Hughey; R E LaPata; T W McElin; R Lussky
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Effect of fetal monitoring on neonatal death rates.

Authors:  R R Neutra; S E Fienberg; S Greenland; E A Friedman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Technologic intervention in obstetrics. Has the pendulum swung too far?

Authors:  R A Baker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  The epidemiology of respiratory distress syndrome in Norway.

Authors:  D M Reed; L S Bakketeig; R P Nugent
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Risk factors associated with post cesarean section febrile morbidity.

Authors:  S L Green; F A Sarubbi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Cesarean section in California--1960 through 1975.

Authors:  D Petitti; R O Olson; R L Williams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-02-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Elective delivery of the term fetus. An obstetrical hazard.

Authors:  M J Maisels; R Rees; K Marks; Z Friedman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Rural hospitals: a literature synthesis and health services research agenda.

Authors:  I S Moscovice
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

3.  Fetal monitoring: creating a culture of safety with informed choice.

Authors:  Lisa Heelan
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

4.  The frequency of complications in cesarean and noncesarean deliveries, 1970 and 1978.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  To section or not to section.

Authors:  W H Pearse
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Complications in cesarean and non-cesarean deliveries: United States, 1980.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The regionalization of perinatal care.

Authors:  M C McCormick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Trends in cesarean section rates for the United States, 1970--78.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation.

Authors:  M Joffe; J Chapple; C Paterson; R W Beard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Evaluation of the effects of the North Carolina Improved Pregnancy Outcome Project: implications for state-level decision-making.

Authors:  M D Peoples; R C Grimson; G L Daughtry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.