Literature DB >> 6650487

Perinatal mortality: standardizing for birthweight is biased.

A J Wilcox, I T Russell.   

Abstract

Standardization is often used to compare perinatal mortality between populations with different birthweight distributions. Unfortunately, the relationship between perinatal mortality and birthweight seldom satisfies one prerequisite for standardization. Furthermore, standardizing for birthweight is biased against populations with heavier birthweights. For example, the standardized perinatal mortality rate of the heavier of two populations is biased upwards by 15 to 25% when the difference in mean birthweight between those populations is 150 g. As a result, the use of standardization may confuse the interpretation of differences in perinatal mortality.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6650487     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  20 in total

1.  Infant health and mortality indicators: their accuracy for monitoring the socio-economic development in the Europe of 1994.

Authors:  G Masuy-stroobant; C Gourbin
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  1995

2.  Incorporating outcome standards into perinatal regulations.

Authors:  B J Turnock; J W Masterson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Recent trends in the incidence of multiple births and associated mortality.

Authors:  B J Botting; I M Davies; A J Macfarlane
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Racial differences in the relation of birth weight and gestational age to neonatal mortality.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M E Tompkins; J M Altekruse; C A Hornung
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Comparison of birthweight and infant mortality between Singapore and England and Wales, 1980.

Authors:  K Hughes
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation.

Authors:  M Joffe; J Chapple; C Paterson; R W Beard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Perinatal factors and adult-onset lupus.

Authors:  Julia F Simard; Elizabeth W Karlson; Karen H Costenbader; Miguel A Hernán; Meir J Stampfer; Matthew H Liang; Murray A Mittleman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-08-15

8.  Three maternal risk factors associated with elevated risk of postneonatal mortality among Alaska native population.

Authors:  Margaret H Blabey; Bradford D Gessner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-04-04

9.  Z-scores and the birthweight paradox.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Brian W Whitcomb; Sunni L Mumford; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Maternal age and infant mortality: a test of the Wilcox-Russell hypothesis.

Authors:  Timothy B Gage; Fu Fang; Erin O'Neill; Howard Stratton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.