Literature DB >> 7950468

Recruitment for breast screening in a rural practice. Trial of a physician's letter of invitation.

B Bass1, D Pross, P Bell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a systematic effort to recruit women for breast screening. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Individually addressed letters, signed by the woman's physician (followed by reminder letters and telephone calls as necessary) were sent to women in a rural family practice, prompting them to make an appointment for breast screening at the Ontario Breast Screening Program-the Kingston Centre. PARTICIPANTS: Women were eligible to receive a letter if they were aged 50 to 69, had not had a mammogram for at least 12 months, and did not have a previous diagnosis of breast cancer or current acute symptoms of breast disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rates were measured to the initial letter, the reminder letter, and the telephone call. Women who came to the breast screening centre as a result of this recruitment effort were surveyed on their reaction to the letter.
RESULTS: The response rate, as measured 9 months after the initial letters were sent, was 57.5%; 38% of respondents to the initial letter and 49% of respondents to the reminder letter said they would not have come to the centre without the letter. Both the breast screening program managers and the family physicians involved considered the project a success.
CONCLUSION: Integrating with an organized breast screening program is one way for busy family physicians systematically to involve their patients in an early detection program without unduly burdening physicians or disrupting normal patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7950468      PMCID: PMC2380359     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of three methods of recalling patients for influenza vaccination.

Authors:  I McDowell; C Newell; W Rosser
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials.

Authors:  L Nyström; L E Rutqvist; S Wall; A Lindgren; M Lindqvist; S Rydén; I Andersson; N Bjurstam; G Fagerberg; J Frisell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Three strategies to promote cancer screening. How feasible is wide-scale implementation?

Authors:  J A Bird; S J McPhee; C Jenkins; D Fordham
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The experience of screening mammography.

Authors:  R J Wolosin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  A randomized study of cancer screening in a family practice setting using a recall model.

Authors:  G L Clementz; J C Aldag; T T Gladfelter; A M Barclay; H F Brooks
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Improving preventive care at a medical clinic: how can the patient help?

Authors:  D M Becker; E B Gomez; D L Kaiser; A Yoshihasi; R H Hodge
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Factors influencing women's decision to undergo mammography.

Authors:  J Kruse; D M Phillips
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial.

Authors:  K C Chu; C R Smart; R E Tarone
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-09-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers.

Authors:  B K Rimer; M K Keintz; H B Kessler; P F Engstrom; J R Rosan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Breast screening.

Authors:  P Bell; B Bass
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Factors determining compliance with screening mammography.

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; F Béland; D Roy; M Falardeau; G Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Health Research Participation, Opportunity, and Willingness Among Minority and Rural Communities of Arkansas.

Authors:  Pearl A McElfish; Christopher R Long; James P Selig; Brett Rowland; Rachel S Purvis; Laura James; Angel Holland; Holly C Felix; Marie-Rachelle Narcisse
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.689

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.