Literature DB >> 8096941

Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials.

L Nyström1, L E Rutqvist, S Wall, A Lindgren, M Lindqvist, S Rydén, I Andersson, N Bjurstam, G Fagerberg, J Frisell.   

Abstract

Despite encouraging results from screening trials the efficacy of mammography in reducing mortality remains somewhat controversial. Five studies have been done in Sweden. This overview, based on 282,777 women followed for 5-13 years in randomised trials in Malmö, Kopparberg, Ostergötland, Stockholm, and Gothenburg, reveals a 24% (95% confidence interval 13-34%) significant reduction of breast cancer mortality among those invited to mammography screening compared with those not invited. To avoid the potential risk of differential misclassification causes of death were assessed by an independent end-point committee after a blinded review of all fatal breast cancer cases. The mortality reduction was similar, irrespective of the end-point used for evaluation ("breast cancer as underlying cause of death" or "breast cancer present at death"). There was a consistent risk reduction associated with screening in all studies, although the point estimate of the relative risk for all ages varied non-significantly between 0.68 and 0.84. The cumulative breast cancer mortality by time since randomisation was estimated at 1.3 per 1000 within 6 years in the invited group compared with 1.6 in the control group. The corresponding figures after 9 years are 2.6 and 3.3 and after 12 years 3.9 and 5.1. The largest reduction of breast cancer mortality (29%) was observed among women aged 50-69 at randomisation. Among women 40-49 there was a non-significant 13% reduction. In this younger age group cumulative breast cancer mortality was similar in the invited and control group during the first 8 years of follow-up. After 8 years there was a difference in favour of the invited women. There was no evidence of any detrimental effect of screening in terms of breast cancer mortality in any age group. Among women aged 70-74 years screening seems to have had only a marginal impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8096941     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  138 in total

Review 1.  Integration of breast imaging into cancer management.

Authors:  L J Esserman; D Wolverton; N Hylton
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Scientific foundation of mammographic screening is based on inconclusive research in Sweden.

Authors:  G Sjönell; L Stâhle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-03

3.  Organized breast cancer screening programs in Canada.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Improving the time to diagnosis after an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; M J Borugian; L Kan; S R Harris; E J Rousseau; S E Thorne; J A Vestrup; C J Wright; A J Coldman; T G Hislop
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

5.  New arrangements for NHS R&D funding: implications for primary care research.

Authors:  Roger Jones; Yvonne Carter; Sean Hilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Cancer recognition and primary care.

Authors:  Nicholas Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Preventive care of older urban American Indians and Alaska natives in primary care.

Authors:  D Buchwald; R Furman; S Ashton; S Manson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Symptoms of possible oncological significance: separating the wheat from the chaff.

Authors:  Nicholas Summerton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-30

9.  Waiting for a diagnosis after an abnormal screening mammogram. SMPBC diagnostic process workgroup. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; L Kan; S King
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

10.  Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.