Literature DB >> 3093045

Comparison of three methods of recalling patients for influenza vaccination.

I McDowell, C Newell, W Rosser.   

Abstract

Despite recommendations supporting annual influenza vaccination for people aged 65 years or older, vaccination rates remain low. Several studies have evaluated the effect of sending mailed reminders, but few have compared alternative ways of reminding patients to receive the vaccine. In a randomized trial of 939 patients aged 65 years or older in four family practices carried out between Oct. 23 and Dec. 31, 1984, we compared three ways of reminding elderly patients to receive the vaccine: personal reminder by the physician, telephone reminder by the nurse and reminder by letter. The vaccination rates for the three groups were 22.9%, 37% and 35.1% respectively. No reminder was issued to a control group, and the rate was 9.8%. Some patients could not be reached by telephone, and some did not see the physician during the specified time. Among the patients whom the nurse actually contacted, the vaccination rate was 43.5%; the rate for patients whom the doctor actually saw was 45.1%. Overall, a telephone reminder by the nurse was the most effective method, and at an hourly salary of $16 or less this method would also be the most cost-effective. The reminders used in this study were automatically generated from a computerized medical record system. The study shows how a computerized system can be used to identify patients for whom preventive procedures are due.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3093045      PMCID: PMC1491283     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  11 in total

1.  Outreach by primary-care physicians.

Authors:  M Henk; J Froom
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-07-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Psychosocial determinants of immunization behavior in a swine influenza campaign.

Authors:  K M Cummings; A M Jette; B M Brock; D P Haefner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Effectiveness of patient recall system on immunization rates for influenza.

Authors:  C Anderson; H Martin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Influenza vaccination in the elderly: 2. The economics of sending reminder letters.

Authors:  J W Frank; L McMurray; M Henderson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A comparison of adverse effects of two influenza vaccines, and the influence on subsequent uptake.

Authors:  M P Ryan; A F MacLeod
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-08

6.  Influenza vaccine--unacceptable or unaccepted.

Authors:  S C Schoenbaum
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Influenza vaccination in the elderly: 1. Determinants of acceptance.

Authors:  J W Frank; M Henderson; L McMurray
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  A hospital-based influenza immunization program, 1977-78.

Authors:  D S Fedson; H A Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The relationship of health beliefs and a postcard reminder to influenza vaccination.

Authors:  E B Larson; E Olsen; W Cole; S Shortell
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Influenza vaccination of elderly persons. Reduction in pneumonia and influenza hospitalizations and deaths.

Authors:  W H Barker; J P Mullooly
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  45 in total

1.  Public health in managed care: a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of postcard reminders.

Authors:  A E Clayton; L A McNutt; H L Homestead; T W Hartman; S Senecal
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Assessing managed care's role in promoting preventive care.

Authors:  M M Amonkar; S Madhavan; S A Rosenbluth; F T Odedina; K J Simon
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

3.  Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: implications for medical informatics.

Authors:  Jen-Hsiang Chuang; George Hripcsak; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Statement on influenza vaccination for the 1992-93 season.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Do our patients receive maximum benefit from preventive care? A North American perspective.

Authors:  W W Rosser; H Lamberts
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 7.  Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

8.  Determinants of Influenza Vaccination: The Physician's Prejudice?

Authors:  L Grbac
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Improving uptake of influenza vaccination among older people: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Antony J Arthur; Ruth J Matthews; Carol Jagger; Michael Clarke; Alison Hipkin; Dean P Bennison
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Evaluation of a simple office-based strategy for increasing influenza vaccine administration and the effect of differing reimbursement plans on the patient acceptance rate.

Authors:  P A Merkel; G C Caputo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.