Literature DB >> 8616736

Factors determining compliance with screening mammography.

M D Beaulieu1, F Béland, D Roy, M Falardeau, G Hébert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors affecting compliance with screening mammography prescribed by family physicians.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a nonrandomized trial.
SETTING: University-affiliated family medicine clinic in Montreal. PATIENTS: Women aged 50 to 69 years who were given a written prescription for a screening mammography during their visit at the clinic between Oct. 12, 1991, and May 31, 1992, and who had not undergone mammography in the preceding 2 years and had never been treated for breast cancer. Information on the potential factors was obtained through a telephone questionnaire 2 months after the visit. OUTCOME MEASURES: Indicator of compliance presence of result of screening mammography in patient chart, potential factors influencing compliance: age, level of education, marital status, socioeconomic level, smoking status, perceived health status, perceived psychological well-being, risk factors for breast cancer, use of health services including frequency of Papanicolaou test, Health Belief Model variables.
RESULTS: Of the 171 eligible women, 113 (66.1%) underwent the prescribed mammography within 2 months after the visit to the clinic, and 149 (87.1%) responded to the questionnaire. The patients' socioeconomic characteristics, perceived health status, health utilization indices and risk factors for breast cancer were not found to be predictors of compliance. The strongest predictor of compliance was the number of previous mammograms. Women who had undergone mammography previously were less likely to be noncompliant than those who had not (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02 to 0.51; p = 0.005). Women who did not comply were less likely than those who did to believe that a prescription from their physician would convince them to undergo mammography (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.007 to 0.60; p = 0.004). Other factors associated with noncompliance were the expression of fear of mammography (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.02; p = 0.03) and the lack of time to take the test (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.21 to 7.80 p = 0.02). Being a smoker was negatively associated with compliance (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.86; p = 0.02). The stepwise logistic regression model accounted for 87.5% of the outcome (chi2 for goodness of fit = 164.4; p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Family physicians who prescribe screening mammography, even to women who consult for other reasons, are likely to overcome some of the barriers observed in association with population screening rates. However, physician-oriented approaches are not likely to reach the 30% to 40% of reluctant women who appear to hold negative views toward physicians' recommendations. Further study is necessary to determine how better to reach these women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8616736      PMCID: PMC1487722     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  33 in total

1.  Attitude or access: reasons for not attending mammography in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  F Kee; A M Telford; P Donaghy; A O'Doherty
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Impact of a breast cancer screening community intervention.

Authors:  J G Zapka; M E Costanza; D R Harris; D Hosmer; A Stoddard; R Barth; V Gaw
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Why do patients decline screening mammography?

Authors:  M Swinker; J G Arbogast; S Murray
Journal:  Fam Pract Res J       Date:  1993-06

4.  Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  R B Hyman; S Baker; R Ephraim; A Moadel; J Philip
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-08

5.  [Breast cancer screening: is family medicine intervention effective?].

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; D Roy; F Béland; M Falardeau; G Hébert
Journal:  Union Med Can       Date:  1994-03

6.  Using physician correspondence and postcard reminders to promote mammography use.

Authors:  S H Taplin; C Anderman; L Grothaus; S Curry; D Montano
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Breast and cervical cancer screening of poor, elderly, black women: clinical results and implications. Harlem Study Team.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; M Traxler; P Lakin; P Kanetsky; L Thomas; P Chauhan; S Matseoane; E Ramsey
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Do general practitioners facilitate the breast screening programme?

Authors:  F Kee
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Recruitment for breast screening in a rural practice. Trial of a physician's letter of invitation.

Authors:  B Bass; D Pross; P Bell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.275

View more
  16 in total

1.  Health insurance and mammography: would a Medicare buy-in take us to universal screening?

Authors:  Donald H Taylor; Lynn Van Scoyoc; Sarah Tropman Hawley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Using an integrated approach to understand vaccination behavior among young men who have sex with men: stages of change, the health belief model, and self-efficacy.

Authors:  Scott D Rhodes; Kenneth C Hergenrather
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-10

3.  Association Between Recency of Immigration and Mammography Uptake: Results from a Canadian National Survey.

Authors:  Prince A Adu; U Vivian Ukah; Sheena D Palmer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-02

4.  Relationship between expanded health belief model variables and mammography screening adherence in women with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Karen Paraska
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2012

5.  Factors affecting patient compliance in the acute setting: an analysis of 20,000 imaging reports.

Authors:  Waqas Shuaib; Arvind Vijayasarathi; Jamlik-Omari Johnson; Ninad Salastekar; Qing He; Kiran Kumar Maddu; Faisal Khosa
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-03-11

6.  Older women's health priorities and perceptions of care delivery: results of the WOW health survey.

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum; Nancy Mayo; Francine Ducharme
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Lalima Hoq; Rose Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Health care utilization, lifestyle, and emotional factors and mammography practices in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Chaya S Moskowitz; Jennifer S Ford; Tara O Henderson; A Lindsay Frazier; Lisa R Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Annette L Stanton; Joanne F Chou; Stephanie Smith; Wendy M Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Cheryl L Cox; Paul C Nathan; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for dyspepsia: exploratory study of factors influencing patient compliance in Greece.

Authors:  Eirini Oikonomidou; Foteini Anastasiou; Ioannis Pilpilidis; Elias Kouroumalis; Christos Lionis
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.