Literature DB >> 7308852

Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection.

F T Fork.   

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of double contrast enema was assessed by colonoscopy of 250 consecutive patients with polypoid lesions that were observed at double contrast enema. The enema method detected 90% of all existing polypoid lesions, and gave false positive results in less than 3.5% Colonoscopy revealed 91% of the lesions. Double contrast enema is suitable as a screening procedure and, when used in combination with colonoscopy, only very few polyps will escape detection. The large number of neoplastic polyps detected in this retrospective series emphasises the necessity for a careful radiographic technique combined with colonoscopy to disclose and treat these potentially malignant lesions of the colon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7308852      PMCID: PMC1419466          DOI: 10.1136/gut.22.11.971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  29 in total

1.  Roentgen diagnosis of small polyps in the colon and rectum.

Authors:  L ANDREN; S FRIEBERG; S WELIN
Journal:  Acta radiol       Date:  1955-03       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  [The complete colon examination (author's transl)].

Authors:  R E Miller
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Comparison of barium enema nad colonoscopy in the detection of small colonic polyps.

Authors:  R F Thoeni; L Menuck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Indications for fiberoptic colonscopy.

Authors:  J P Christie; H Shinya
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 5.  Polyps and cancer of the large bowel.

Authors:  H T Enterline
Journal:  Curr Top Pathol       Date:  1976

6.  Diminutive colonic polyps--clinical significance and management.

Authors:  S Granqvist; N Gabrielsson; P Sundelin
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Results of the Malmö technique of colon examination.

Authors:  S Welin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1967-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparison of colonoscopy and the contrast enema in five hundred patients with colorectal disease.

Authors:  W I Wolff; H Shinya; A Geffen; S Ozoktay; R DeBeer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Malignancy of colonic polyps. Diagnosis and management.

Authors:  N Gabrielsson; S Granqvist; H Ohlsén; P Sundelin
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1978

10.  [How reliable is radiology in the diagnosis of large bowel carcinoma?].

Authors:  E von Goumoens; H J Nüesch; E Kobler; H Säuberli; P Deyhle
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1977-04-16
View more
  13 in total

1.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

2.  Double-contrast barium enema study with computed radiography: assessment in detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Y Okada; S Kusano; T Endo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Predictive value of a diagnosis of colonic polyp on the double-contrast barium enema.

Authors:  D J Ott; D S Ablin; D W Gelfand; I Meschan
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1983

4.  Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  S Lemon; J Zapka; E Puleo; R Luckmann; L Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: continued value of the barium enema.

Authors:  D H Frager; J D Frager; E L Wolf; T C Beneventano
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1987

6.  Colon cancer screening update and management of the malignant polyp.

Authors:  James M Church
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

7.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in mammography-adherent older women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Jennifer S Ford; David Klein; Louis H Primavera; Tamara R Buckley; Traci R Stein; Moshe Shike; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-12

8.  Benign colorectal neoplasms undetected by colonoscopy.

Authors:  D W Gelfand; M Y Chen; D J Ott
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

9.  Reliability of routine double contrast examination of the large bowel: a prospective study of 2590 patients.

Authors:  F T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Hydrosonography in the evaluation of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  U P Ling; J Y Chen; C J Hwang; C K Lin; M H Chang
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.